中南大学学报(医学版)
中南大學學報(醫學版)
중남대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCES)
2014年
11期
1177-1180
,共4页
任磊%刘春凤%周业江
任磊%劉春鳳%週業江
임뢰%류춘봉%주업강
直肠癌%低位前切术%吻合口瘘
直腸癌%低位前切術%吻閤口瘺
직장암%저위전절술%문합구루
rectal cancer%low anterior resection%anastomotic leakage
目的:探讨改良冲洗法应用于直肠癌低位前切除术(Dixon手术)后吻合口瘘的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析泸州医学院附属医院438例Dixon手术中39例吻合口瘘患者的治疗方法,根据冲洗方法不同将吻合口瘘患者分为传统冲洗组(23例)和改良冲洗组(16例),对患者的疗效进行对比分析。结果:本研究直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的发生率为8.9%(39/438),39例吻合口瘘患者经过非手术治疗均治愈。对比分析两组治疗效果,改良组患者引流管开口周围皮肤清洁程度明显高于传统组,而患者平均住院时间以及引流管拔出时间均短于传统组(均P<0.05)。结论:改良冲洗法相对于传统法更适用于直肠癌术后吻合口瘘患者,患者或家属均可操作,值得在临床中推广与使用。
目的:探討改良遲洗法應用于直腸癌低位前切除術(Dixon手術)後吻閤口瘺的臨床效果。方法:迴顧性分析瀘州醫學院附屬醫院438例Dixon手術中39例吻閤口瘺患者的治療方法,根據遲洗方法不同將吻閤口瘺患者分為傳統遲洗組(23例)和改良遲洗組(16例),對患者的療效進行對比分析。結果:本研究直腸癌術後吻閤口瘺的髮生率為8.9%(39/438),39例吻閤口瘺患者經過非手術治療均治愈。對比分析兩組治療效果,改良組患者引流管開口週圍皮膚清潔程度明顯高于傳統組,而患者平均住院時間以及引流管拔齣時間均短于傳統組(均P<0.05)。結論:改良遲洗法相對于傳統法更適用于直腸癌術後吻閤口瘺患者,患者或傢屬均可操作,值得在臨床中推廣與使用。
목적:탐토개량충세법응용우직장암저위전절제술(Dixon수술)후문합구루적림상효과。방법:회고성분석로주의학원부속의원438례Dixon수술중39례문합구루환자적치료방법,근거충세방법불동장문합구루환자분위전통충세조(23례)화개량충세조(16례),대환자적료효진행대비분석。결과:본연구직장암술후문합구루적발생솔위8.9%(39/438),39례문합구루환자경과비수술치료균치유。대비분석량조치료효과,개량조환자인류관개구주위피부청길정도명현고우전통조,이환자평균주원시간이급인류관발출시간균단우전통조(균P<0.05)。결론:개량충세법상대우전통법경괄용우직장암술후문합구루환자,환자혹가속균가조작,치득재림상중추엄여사용。
Objective: To investigate clinical effect of improved flushing method applied in anastomotic leakage (AL) atfer low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to analyze the therapeutic effect for 39 AL from 438 patients who received Dixon surgery in the Affliated Hospital of Luzhou Medical College. Among them, 23 patients received the traditional lfushing method (the traditional group) and 16 received the improved lfushing method (the improved group). Results: hTe rate of AL was 8.9% (39/438). All patients were cured with non-operative treatment. hTe cleanliness degree of the surrounding skin of drainage tube in the improved group was higher than that in the traditional group. hTe duration of average hospitalization and extubation of drainage tube was shorter in the improved group than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the traditional methods, the improved one is better for the ALpatients. Both the patients themselves or their family members can chose it. hTe improved lfushing method is worth to be spread in clinic.