中外女性健康研究
中外女性健康研究
중외녀성건강연구
Women's Health Research
2015年
10期
2-3
,共2页
急性胃穿孔%胃大部切除术%单纯修补术%临床效果
急性胃穿孔%胃大部切除術%單純脩補術%臨床效果
급성위천공%위대부절제술%단순수보술%림상효과
Simple Closure%Subtotal Gastrectomy%Acute Gastric Perforation%Clinical results
目的：比较胃大部切除术与单纯修补术治疗急性胃穿孔的临床效果。方法：将我院56例急性胃穿孔患者按照手术方式的不同分为切除术组和修补术组，分析两组患者手术时长、住院天数、术后并发症及复发率等情况。结果：修补术组患者手术时间、住院天数及术后并发症的发生数均好于切除术组，两组之间存在显著性差异，有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；切除术组患者和修补术组患者术后复发状况之间有显著性差异，有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：胃大部切除术与单纯修补术作为治疗急性胃穿孔的两种常用方法，具有各自的优点和缺点，在实际工作中应根据患者实际情况选择合理的治疗方式。
目的：比較胃大部切除術與單純脩補術治療急性胃穿孔的臨床效果。方法：將我院56例急性胃穿孔患者按照手術方式的不同分為切除術組和脩補術組，分析兩組患者手術時長、住院天數、術後併髮癥及複髮率等情況。結果：脩補術組患者手術時間、住院天數及術後併髮癥的髮生數均好于切除術組，兩組之間存在顯著性差異，有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；切除術組患者和脩補術組患者術後複髮狀況之間有顯著性差異，有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論：胃大部切除術與單純脩補術作為治療急性胃穿孔的兩種常用方法，具有各自的優點和缺點，在實際工作中應根據患者實際情況選擇閤理的治療方式。
목적：비교위대부절제술여단순수보술치료급성위천공적림상효과。방법：장아원56례급성위천공환자안조수술방식적불동분위절제술조화수보술조，분석량조환자수술시장、주원천수、술후병발증급복발솔등정황。결과：수보술조환자수술시간、주원천수급술후병발증적발생수균호우절제술조，량조지간존재현저성차이，유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；절제술조환자화수보술조환자술후복발상황지간유현저성차이，유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론：위대부절제술여단순수보술작위치료급성위천공적량충상용방법，구유각자적우점화결점，재실제공작중응근거환자실제정황선택합리적치료방식。
Objective:To observe and contrast the clinical effects of subtotal gastrectomy and simple closure for acute gastric perforation.Method:Selected 56 patients with acute gastric perforation is divided according to different surgical excision group and closure group, analysis of the two groups were operative time、length of stay、postoperative complications and recurrence rate , etc. Results:The closure group in operative time、length of stay、postoperative complications better than those in the excision group, difference has statistics meaning(p<0.05);The closure group in long-term recurrence rate higher than the excision group, different has statistics meaning (p<0.05).Conclusion:Subtotal gastrectomy and simple closure as two common methods of treatment of acute gastric perforation, has its own advantages and disadvantages,In practical work should be a reasonable choice of treatment according to the actual situation of the patient.
