中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
15期
70-71
,共2页
输尿管结石%微创碎石手术%临床效果
輸尿管結石%微創碎石手術%臨床效果
수뇨관결석%미창쇄석수술%림상효과
Ureteral calculi%Lithotripsy minimaly invasive operation%Clinical effect
目的：输尿管上段结石的两种治疗方法疗效及并发症的比较。方法选取我院共收治100例输尿管结石患者，其中，54例患者实施经输尿管镜碎石术，将其记为对照组，其余46例患者则应用经皮肾镜碎石术，将其记为观察组。结果两组患者的碎石清除率和手术治疗的有效率比较，观察组均要明显高于对照组患者，比较差异有显著性的统计学的意义（P<0.05）。结论在对输尿管结石患者进行治疗时，经皮肾镜的手术方式的治疗效果更佳，值得推广。
目的：輸尿管上段結石的兩種治療方法療效及併髮癥的比較。方法選取我院共收治100例輸尿管結石患者，其中，54例患者實施經輸尿管鏡碎石術，將其記為對照組，其餘46例患者則應用經皮腎鏡碎石術，將其記為觀察組。結果兩組患者的碎石清除率和手術治療的有效率比較，觀察組均要明顯高于對照組患者，比較差異有顯著性的統計學的意義（P<0.05）。結論在對輸尿管結石患者進行治療時，經皮腎鏡的手術方式的治療效果更佳，值得推廣。
목적：수뇨관상단결석적량충치료방법료효급병발증적비교。방법선취아원공수치100례수뇨관결석환자，기중，54례환자실시경수뇨관경쇄석술，장기기위대조조，기여46례환자칙응용경피신경쇄석술，장기기위관찰조。결과량조환자적쇄석청제솔화수술치료적유효솔비교，관찰조균요명현고우대조조환자，비교차이유현저성적통계학적의의（P<0.05）。결론재대수뇨관결석환자진행치료시，경피신경적수술방식적치료효과경가，치득추엄。
Objective To compare the two methods in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and complications. Methods In our hospital treated a total of 100 cases of ureteral calculi patients, among them, 54 cases underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy, the notes for the control group, the other 46 patients with percutaneous nephrolithotomy, wil be recorded as observation group.ResultsThe two groups of patients with operation treatment for stone clearance rate and the efficiency comparison, observation group were significantly higher than the patients in the control group, there was statisticaly significant difference (P < 0.05) and the significance.Conclusion In the treatment of ureteral calculi patients, by way of the operation of percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment effect is better, is worthy of promotion.
