口腔颌面外科杂志
口腔頜麵外科雜誌
구강합면외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
2015年
3期
220-223
,共4页
下颌骨%埋伏第三磨牙%冲击式气动手机%拔牙术%并发症
下頜骨%埋伏第三磨牙%遲擊式氣動手機%拔牙術%併髮癥
하합골%매복제삼마아%충격식기동수궤%발아술%병발증
mandibular%impacted third molar%impact air handpiece%tooth extraction%complications
目的：比较45°仰角冲击式气动手机拔牙法和传统骨凿拔牙法拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的不同临床疗效。方法：将240颗下颌低位阻生智齿随机分为研究组与对照组，分别采用冲击式气动手机拔牙法(研究组)和传统骨凿去骨拔牙法(对照组)拔除。比较两组拔除的手术时间，评价两组术中、术后并发症的发生情况，并进行统计学分析。结果：研究组手术时间比对照组手术时间短(P<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症的发生差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：采用45°仰角冲击式气动手机拔牙法拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果要优于传统骨凿拔牙法，值得临床推荐。
目的：比較45°仰角遲擊式氣動手機拔牙法和傳統骨鑿拔牙法拔除下頜低位阻生智齒的不同臨床療效。方法：將240顆下頜低位阻生智齒隨機分為研究組與對照組，分彆採用遲擊式氣動手機拔牙法(研究組)和傳統骨鑿去骨拔牙法(對照組)拔除。比較兩組拔除的手術時間，評價兩組術中、術後併髮癥的髮生情況，併進行統計學分析。結果：研究組手術時間比對照組手術時間短(P<0.05)。兩組患者術後併髮癥的髮生差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論：採用45°仰角遲擊式氣動手機拔牙法拔除下頜低位阻生智齒的臨床效果要優于傳統骨鑿拔牙法，值得臨床推薦。
목적：비교45°앙각충격식기동수궤발아법화전통골착발아법발제하합저위조생지치적불동림상료효。방법：장240과하합저위조생지치수궤분위연구조여대조조，분별채용충격식기동수궤발아법(연구조)화전통골착거골발아법(대조조)발제。비교량조발제적수술시간，평개량조술중、술후병발증적발생정황，병진행통계학분석。결과：연구조수술시간비대조조수술시간단(P<0.05)。량조환자술후병발증적발생차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론：채용45°앙각충격식기동수궤발아법발제하합저위조생지치적림상효과요우우전통골착발아법，치득림상추천。
Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of impact air handpiece in exodontia of mandible impact third mo-lars. Methods: 240 impacted mandibular third molars were randomly and equally divided into two groups. Teeth in test group were extracted using impact air handpiece odontotomy and using traditional chisel odontotomy in control group. All statistical analysis were carried out with SPSS 17.0 for Windows. Results: There was significant differences between two groups in extraction time length and complications (P<0.05). Conclusion:Impact air handpiece demonstrate more benefits than traditional chisels in exodontia of impact mandibular third molars. We thought the method was recommendable.
