河南外科学杂志
河南外科學雜誌
하남외과학잡지
HENAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2015年
3期
24-26
,共3页
系统化护理干预模式%低位直肠癌%腹腔镜手术%应用
繫統化護理榦預模式%低位直腸癌%腹腔鏡手術%應用
계통화호리간예모식%저위직장암%복강경수술%응용
Systematic nursing intervention mode%Low rectal cancer%Laparoscopic operation%Application
目的:探讨系统化护理干预模式在低位直肠癌行腹腔镜手术患者中的应用效果。方法采用历史对照研究,将2013-01后实行系统护理干预的62例低位直肠癌患者作为干预组,2012-01—2012-12间常规护理59例低位直肠癌患者作为对照组,比较2组患者术后镇痛药物使用率、术后恢复情况、并发症发生率。出院后患者均接受1~3个月随访,采用 SF -36量表评价患者生活质量。结果2组患者均保肛成功,干预组肠功能恢复时间、平均住院时间明显短于对照组,止痛药物使用率为11.26%,并发症发生率3.23%,均低于对照组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。患者出院后均随访1~3个月,干预组患者在总体评分及生理机能等8个维度评分均高于对照组,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论系统护理干预为患者提供多角度、全方位指导,不仅有利于治疗方案的顺利实施,对术后的康复及生活质量的提高至关重要。
目的:探討繫統化護理榦預模式在低位直腸癌行腹腔鏡手術患者中的應用效果。方法採用歷史對照研究,將2013-01後實行繫統護理榦預的62例低位直腸癌患者作為榦預組,2012-01—2012-12間常規護理59例低位直腸癌患者作為對照組,比較2組患者術後鎮痛藥物使用率、術後恢複情況、併髮癥髮生率。齣院後患者均接受1~3箇月隨訪,採用 SF -36量錶評價患者生活質量。結果2組患者均保肛成功,榦預組腸功能恢複時間、平均住院時間明顯短于對照組,止痛藥物使用率為11.26%,併髮癥髮生率3.23%,均低于對照組,2組比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。患者齣院後均隨訪1~3箇月,榦預組患者在總體評分及生理機能等8箇維度評分均高于對照組,2組比較,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論繫統護理榦預為患者提供多角度、全方位指導,不僅有利于治療方案的順利實施,對術後的康複及生活質量的提高至關重要。
목적:탐토계통화호리간예모식재저위직장암행복강경수술환자중적응용효과。방법채용역사대조연구,장2013-01후실행계통호리간예적62례저위직장암환자작위간예조,2012-01—2012-12간상규호리59례저위직장암환자작위대조조,비교2조환자술후진통약물사용솔、술후회복정황、병발증발생솔。출원후환자균접수1~3개월수방,채용 SF -36량표평개환자생활질량。결과2조환자균보항성공,간예조장공능회복시간、평균주원시간명현단우대조조,지통약물사용솔위11.26%,병발증발생솔3.23%,균저우대조조,2조비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。환자출원후균수방1~3개월,간예조환자재총체평분급생리궤능등8개유도평분균고우대조조,2조비교,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론계통호리간예위환자제공다각도、전방위지도,불부유리우치료방안적순리실시,대술후적강복급생활질량적제고지관중요。
Objective To explore the effect of nursing intervention model system in patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparo-scopic operation. Methods Totally 62 cases of patients with low rectal cancer in our hospital after 2013 January the systematic nursing inter-vention as intervention group,59 cases of low rectal cancer patients from 2012. 1 to 2012. 12 of routine nursing as control group,compared two groups of patients with postoperative analgesia drug utilization rate,postoperative recovery,complication rate;discharge all patients were treated with 1 - 3 months of follow - up,the SF - 36 scale of quality of life in patients with evaluation. Results Two patients were anal preserving successful intervention group,intestinal function recovery time,hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group,analgesic drug use rate was 11. 26% ,the incidence of complications was 3. 23% ,was lower than that of the control group,the differences between the two groups was significant(P < 0. 05). Patients were followed up for 3 months,patients in the intervention group were higher than that of the con-trol group in 8 dimensions of overall score and physiological functions such as the score,differences between the two groups was significant (P < 0. 05). Conclusion Systematic nursing intervention for patients with a multi angle,all - round guidance,not only conducive to the smooth implementation of the treatment,rehabilitation and quality of life after surgery also improved obviously.