中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
17期
59-60
,共2页
NK细胞%CIK细胞%γδT细胞%化疗%小细胞肺癌
NK細胞%CIK細胞%γδT細胞%化療%小細胞肺癌
NK세포%CIK세포%γδT세포%화료%소세포폐암
NK cells%CIK cells%T cells%Chemotherapy%Small cell lung cancer
目的:探讨NK细胞、CIK细胞及γδT细胞免疫治疗联合化疗治疗小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法选取94例小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,根据其入院顺序分成联合组(A组,n=47)和对照组(B组,n=47)两组。 B组仅予以(依托泊苷+顺铂)单纯化疗方案,A组则采用细胞免疫联合化疗方案。行为期2~5年随访,比对两组患者总生存期及无进展生存期差异,记录其相关不良反应发生情况。结果①A、B两组的局限期患者在PFS及1年生存率对比上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组局限期患者OS及2年生存率优于B组(P<0.05);A组广泛期患者在FPS、OS、1年及2年生存率等指标对比上均明显优于B组(P<0.05);两组局限期患者PFS及OS均长于广泛期患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);②两组患者不良反应发生率对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对小细胞肺癌患者予以细胞免疫治疗联合化疗方案,疗效突出,值得临床推广。
目的:探討NK細胞、CIK細胞及γδT細胞免疫治療聯閤化療治療小細胞肺癌的臨床療效。方法選取94例小細胞肺癌患者為研究對象,根據其入院順序分成聯閤組(A組,n=47)和對照組(B組,n=47)兩組。 B組僅予以(依託泊苷+順鉑)單純化療方案,A組則採用細胞免疫聯閤化療方案。行為期2~5年隨訪,比對兩組患者總生存期及無進展生存期差異,記錄其相關不良反應髮生情況。結果①A、B兩組的跼限期患者在PFS及1年生存率對比上差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);A組跼限期患者OS及2年生存率優于B組(P<0.05);A組廣汎期患者在FPS、OS、1年及2年生存率等指標對比上均明顯優于B組(P<0.05);兩組跼限期患者PFS及OS均長于廣汎期患者,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);②兩組患者不良反應髮生率對比差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論對小細胞肺癌患者予以細胞免疫治療聯閤化療方案,療效突齣,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토NK세포、CIK세포급γδT세포면역치료연합화료치료소세포폐암적림상료효。방법선취94례소세포폐암환자위연구대상,근거기입원순서분성연합조(A조,n=47)화대조조(B조,n=47)량조。 B조부여이(의탁박감+순박)단순화료방안,A조칙채용세포면역연합화료방안。행위기2~5년수방,비대량조환자총생존기급무진전생존기차이,기록기상관불량반응발생정황。결과①A、B량조적국한기환자재PFS급1년생존솔대비상차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);A조국한기환자OS급2년생존솔우우B조(P<0.05);A조엄범기환자재FPS、OS、1년급2년생존솔등지표대비상균명현우우B조(P<0.05);량조국한기환자PFS급OS균장우엄범기환자,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);②량조환자불량반응발생솔대비차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론대소세포폐암환자여이세포면역치료연합화료방안,료효돌출,치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of NK cells, CIK cells and T cells immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Methods 94 patients with small cell lung cancer were selected as the re-search objects and divided into combined group (group A, n=47) and control group (group B, n=47) according to the admission time.Group B was received only chemotherapy scheme (etoposide +cisplatin), while group A was treated with combined cells im-munotherapy. In the 2-5 years following-up, overall survival and progression free survival were compared between the two groups and occurrence of adverse reactions of them were recorded. Results ①The PFS and 1 years survival rate of group A.B at limited stage had no statistic significance (P>0.05);Limited stage of patients in group A with OS and 2 years survival rate was better than that of group B (P<0.05);Contrast to FPS, wide OS, 1 years and 2 years survival rate and other indicators in group A during ex-tensive stage were obviously better than those in B group (P<0.05);the PFS and OS in two group of limited stage of patients were longer than those of patients , differences were significant (P<0.05); ② The toxic side effect reaction rate of two groups patients had no significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with small cell lung cancer, the curative effect of cells immunotherapy com-bined with chemotherapy is obvious, so it is worth the clinical promotion.