实用医院临床杂志
實用醫院臨床雜誌
실용의원림상잡지
PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
2015年
4期
70-71,72
,共3页
根管封闭剂%根尖封闭性%根管治疗
根管封閉劑%根尖封閉性%根管治療
근관봉폐제%근첨봉폐성%근관치료
Root canal sealer%Apical sealing ability%Root canal therapy
目的:评价根管充填剂、AH plus 和 iRoot SP 三种根管封闭剂的根尖密封性。方法选择拔除的单根管牙39颗,按随机数字表法分为根管充填剂组、AH plus 组和 iRoot SP 组各13颗牙,手用器械逐步后退法进行体外根管预备后,采用冷牙胶侧方加压法对各组离体牙进行牙胶尖+相应的根管封闭剂根管充填,使用染料渗透法检测各组染料渗透入根管内的长度,并进行比较。结果根管充填剂组根管内染色长度大于 AH plus 组和 iRoot SP 组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),AH plus组和 iRoot SP 组根管内染色长度差异无统计学意义。结论 AH plus 和 iRoot SP 根尖封闭性能相近,根管充填剂的根尖封闭性弱于 AH plus 和 iRoot SP。
目的:評價根管充填劑、AH plus 和 iRoot SP 三種根管封閉劑的根尖密封性。方法選擇拔除的單根管牙39顆,按隨機數字錶法分為根管充填劑組、AH plus 組和 iRoot SP 組各13顆牙,手用器械逐步後退法進行體外根管預備後,採用冷牙膠側方加壓法對各組離體牙進行牙膠尖+相應的根管封閉劑根管充填,使用染料滲透法檢測各組染料滲透入根管內的長度,併進行比較。結果根管充填劑組根管內染色長度大于 AH plus 組和 iRoot SP 組,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05),AH plus組和 iRoot SP 組根管內染色長度差異無統計學意義。結論 AH plus 和 iRoot SP 根尖封閉性能相近,根管充填劑的根尖封閉性弱于 AH plus 和 iRoot SP。
목적:평개근관충전제、AH plus 화 iRoot SP 삼충근관봉폐제적근첨밀봉성。방법선택발제적단근관아39과,안수궤수자표법분위근관충전제조、AH plus 조화 iRoot SP 조각13과아,수용기계축보후퇴법진행체외근관예비후,채용랭아효측방가압법대각조리체아진행아효첨+상응적근관봉폐제근관충전,사용염료삼투법검측각조염료삼투입근관내적장도,병진행비교。결과근관충전제조근관내염색장도대우 AH plus 조화 iRoot SP 조,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05),AH plus조화 iRoot SP 조근관내염색장도차이무통계학의의。결론 AH plus 화 iRoot SP 근첨봉폐성능상근,근관충전제적근첨봉폐성약우 AH plus 화 iRoot SP。
Objective To compare the sealing ability of three kinds of sealing materials (canal filling agent,AH plus and iRoot SP)in root canal therapy.Methods Thirty-nine newly extracted single-canal teeth were divided into three groups .The root canals were prepared using hand instruments ,and obturated with corresponding sealing materials by step -back technique.The sealing ability was e-valuated by dye penetration method .Results The mean dyeing length of root canal filling agent was significantly longer than AH plus and iRoot SP(P <0.05).Conclusion AH plus and iRoot SP have sealing ability that is better than root canal filling ? agent in root canal therapy.