中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
19期
149-152
,共4页
慢性肾小球肾炎%人性化护理%SAS评分%SDS评分%生活质量
慢性腎小毬腎炎%人性化護理%SAS評分%SDS評分%生活質量
만성신소구신염%인성화호리%SAS평분%SDS평분%생활질량
Chronic glomerulonephritis%Humanistic nursing%SAS score%SDS score%Quality of life
目的：研究和探讨人性化护理干预对慢性肾小球肾炎患者心理及生活质量的影响。方法选择2013年1月~2014年1月在我院住院治疗的慢性肾小球肾炎患者60例，根据护理方法不同随机分为观察组(n=30)和对照组(n=30)。其中对照组患者采用常规的护理方法；观察组采取人性化护理，对比分析两组的疗效及生活质量评分、SAS评分、SDS评分。结果观察组的总有效率达90.00%(27/30)，显著高于对照组的总有效率70.00%(21/30)，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；干预组和对照组干预后的SAS评分、SDS评分较干预前显著降低，且干预组显著低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)，干预组和对照组干预后的精力、疼痛、情绪反应、睡眠、社交隔离和躯体活动评分较干预前显著降低，且干预组分别显著低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论人性化护理干预可以提高慢性肾小球肾炎的疗效及生活质量，缓解患者的焦虑、抑郁心理，从而使其能够积极配合治疗和护理。
目的：研究和探討人性化護理榦預對慢性腎小毬腎炎患者心理及生活質量的影響。方法選擇2013年1月~2014年1月在我院住院治療的慢性腎小毬腎炎患者60例，根據護理方法不同隨機分為觀察組(n=30)和對照組(n=30)。其中對照組患者採用常規的護理方法；觀察組採取人性化護理，對比分析兩組的療效及生活質量評分、SAS評分、SDS評分。結果觀察組的總有效率達90.00%(27/30)，顯著高于對照組的總有效率70.00%(21/30)，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)；榦預組和對照組榦預後的SAS評分、SDS評分較榦預前顯著降低，且榦預組顯著低于對照組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)，榦預組和對照組榦預後的精力、疼痛、情緒反應、睡眠、社交隔離和軀體活動評分較榦預前顯著降低，且榦預組分彆顯著低于對照組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論人性化護理榦預可以提高慢性腎小毬腎炎的療效及生活質量，緩解患者的焦慮、抑鬱心理，從而使其能夠積極配閤治療和護理。
목적：연구화탐토인성화호리간예대만성신소구신염환자심리급생활질량적영향。방법선택2013년1월~2014년1월재아원주원치료적만성신소구신염환자60례，근거호리방법불동수궤분위관찰조(n=30)화대조조(n=30)。기중대조조환자채용상규적호리방법；관찰조채취인성화호리，대비분석량조적료효급생활질량평분、SAS평분、SDS평분。결과관찰조적총유효솔체90.00%(27/30)，현저고우대조조적총유효솔70.00%(21/30)，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；간예조화대조조간예후적SAS평분、SDS평분교간예전현저강저，차간예조현저저우대조조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)，간예조화대조조간예후적정력、동통、정서반응、수면、사교격리화구체활동평분교간예전현저강저，차간예조분별현저저우대조조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론인성화호리간예가이제고만성신소구신염적료효급생활질량，완해환자적초필、억욱심리，종이사기능구적겁배합치료화호리。
Objective To study and explore the influence of humanized nursing on psychological state and life quality in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. Methods From January 2013 to January 2014 in our hospital 60 patients with chronic glomerulonephritis according to the different nursing methods were divided into observation group (n=30) and control group (n=30). The patients in the control group treated by conventional methods of care. The observation group with humanistic nursing, the efficacy of the two groups, and two groups of the patient's quality of life score, SAS score, SDS score were compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 90.00% (27/30), was sig-nificantly higher than that in the control group 70.00%(21/30), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The SAS score, SDS score of intervention group and the control group after the intervention were significantly lower than be-fore intervention, and the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statisti-cally significant(P<0.05), Energy, pain, emotional reactions, sleep, social isolation and somatic activity score of the in-tervention group and the control group after the intervention were significantly reduced compared with those before in-tervention, and the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically sig-nificant (P<0.05). Conclusion The humanized nursing intervention can improve the effect and quality of life in chronic glomerulonephritis, anxiety, depression, so as to enable them to actively cooperate with treatment and nursing.
