中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
14期
117-119
,共3页
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%集束化康复干预%生活质量
慢性阻塞性肺疾病%集束化康複榦預%生活質量
만성조새성폐질병%집속화강복간예%생활질량
COPD%Intensive rehabilitation intervention%The quality of life
目的:探讨集束化康复干预对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)稳定期患者生活质量的影响。方法:80例 COPD 稳定期患者分为干预组(n=40)与对照组(n=40)。干预组给予体能锻炼、呼吸肌锻炼、氧疗、宣教、心理与行为干预等综合健康教育与康复管理措施,对照组仅在门诊取药治疗。利用生活质量量表(SGRQ)评分标准分别在治疗前后对两组患者的生活质量进行评估。结果:入组前两组患者SGRQ中呼吸症状,疾病影响及SGRQ各项指标比较无显著性差异(P>05),干预组患者治疗后的SGRQ中呼吸症状,疾病影响及SGRQ各项指标与治疗前比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);对照组治疗后各项指标与治疗前相比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),干预后干预组与对照组各项指标比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:集束化康复干预能够提高COPD稳定期患者的生活质量。
目的:探討集束化康複榦預對慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)穩定期患者生活質量的影響。方法:80例 COPD 穩定期患者分為榦預組(n=40)與對照組(n=40)。榦預組給予體能鍛煉、呼吸肌鍛煉、氧療、宣教、心理與行為榦預等綜閤健康教育與康複管理措施,對照組僅在門診取藥治療。利用生活質量量錶(SGRQ)評分標準分彆在治療前後對兩組患者的生活質量進行評估。結果:入組前兩組患者SGRQ中呼吸癥狀,疾病影響及SGRQ各項指標比較無顯著性差異(P>05),榦預組患者治療後的SGRQ中呼吸癥狀,疾病影響及SGRQ各項指標與治療前比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05);對照組治療後各項指標與治療前相比較無顯著性差異(P>0.05),榦預後榦預組與對照組各項指標比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。結論:集束化康複榦預能夠提高COPD穩定期患者的生活質量。
목적:탐토집속화강복간예대만성조새성폐병(COPD)은정기환자생활질량적영향。방법:80례 COPD 은정기환자분위간예조(n=40)여대조조(n=40)。간예조급여체능단련、호흡기단련、양료、선교、심리여행위간예등종합건강교육여강복관리조시,대조조부재문진취약치료。이용생활질량량표(SGRQ)평분표준분별재치료전후대량조환자적생활질량진행평고。결과:입조전량조환자SGRQ중호흡증상,질병영향급SGRQ각항지표비교무현저성차이(P>05),간예조환자치료후적SGRQ중호흡증상,질병영향급SGRQ각항지표여치료전비교유현저성차이(P<0.05);대조조치료후각항지표여치료전상비교무현저성차이(P>0.05),간예후간예조여대조조각항지표비교유현저성차이(P<0.05)。결론:집속화강복간예능구제고COPD은정기환자적생활질량。
Objective:To explore cluster intervention on the stable quality of life of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Methods: 80 cases of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were divided into the psychological intervention group (n=40) and the control group (n=40). The former were given treatment of baseing on physical exercise, respiratory muscle exercise, oxygen therapy, missionary, psychological and behavioral interventions such as comprehensive health education and management measures. The control group were treated only in out-patient dispensary. And then assessment, quality of life using Quality of Life Scale (SGRQ) score standards before and after treatment. Results:There was no significant difference in SGRQ respiratory symptoms, disease impact and the SGRQ indicators of the two groups at baseline (P>0.05). After the invention there was significant difference in the treatment group of the patients with SGRQ respiratory symptoms, disease impact and the SGRQ indicators compared with before treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the indicators in the control group (P>0.05). There was significant difference between intervention group and control group after the intervention of the indicators. Conclusion:Comprehensive cluster intervention can improve quality of life in patients with stable COPD.