中华医学超声杂志(电子版)
中華醫學超聲雜誌(電子版)
중화의학초성잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND(ELECTRONICAL VISION)
2015年
6期
493-496
,共4页
李加平%雷震%龙劲松%朱婷%邓晓妃%郑虎山
李加平%雷震%龍勁鬆%硃婷%鄧曉妃%鄭虎山
리가평%뢰진%룡경송%주정%산효비%정호산
超声检查%颈椎%臂丛神经病%射频热凝
超聲檢查%頸椎%臂叢神經病%射頻熱凝
초성검사%경추%비총신경병%사빈열응
Ultrasonography%Cervical vertebrae%Brachial plexus neuropathies%Radiofrequency thermocoagulaion
目的:探讨超声引导下臂丛神经根射频热凝联合阻滞治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床应用价值。方法收集2012年8月至2014年9月在广东医学院附属深圳南山医院临床诊断为神经根型颈椎病,拟行神经根靶点射频热凝联合阻滞治疗的65例患者。采用6~13 MHz高频超声引导下颈5~7神经根射频热凝及注药阻滞治疗,术前及术后均应用目测类比评分法(VAS)评定患者疼痛程度。结果62例患者均可清晰显示各段神经根,3例患者不能确定,需利用神经刺激仪定位确认,65例均穿刺成功,成功率100%,未发现神经损伤及其他并发症,术前及术后1周、4周、12周VAS评分分别为(8.65±0.47)、(3.68±0.49)、(2.51±0.32)、(1.73±0.21)分,治疗前与治疗后各时间点比较,差异均有统计学意义(t值=58.71、86.23、107.72,P值均<0.01)。结论超声引导下臂丛神经根射频热凝联合阻滞具有实时引导、安全、无辐射等优点,有望在临床上得到推广。
目的:探討超聲引導下臂叢神經根射頻熱凝聯閤阻滯治療神經根型頸椎病的臨床應用價值。方法收集2012年8月至2014年9月在廣東醫學院附屬深圳南山醫院臨床診斷為神經根型頸椎病,擬行神經根靶點射頻熱凝聯閤阻滯治療的65例患者。採用6~13 MHz高頻超聲引導下頸5~7神經根射頻熱凝及註藥阻滯治療,術前及術後均應用目測類比評分法(VAS)評定患者疼痛程度。結果62例患者均可清晰顯示各段神經根,3例患者不能確定,需利用神經刺激儀定位確認,65例均穿刺成功,成功率100%,未髮現神經損傷及其他併髮癥,術前及術後1週、4週、12週VAS評分分彆為(8.65±0.47)、(3.68±0.49)、(2.51±0.32)、(1.73±0.21)分,治療前與治療後各時間點比較,差異均有統計學意義(t值=58.71、86.23、107.72,P值均<0.01)。結論超聲引導下臂叢神經根射頻熱凝聯閤阻滯具有實時引導、安全、無輻射等優點,有望在臨床上得到推廣。
목적:탐토초성인도하비총신경근사빈열응연합조체치료신경근형경추병적림상응용개치。방법수집2012년8월지2014년9월재엄동의학원부속심수남산의원림상진단위신경근형경추병,의행신경근파점사빈열응연합조체치료적65례환자。채용6~13 MHz고빈초성인도하경5~7신경근사빈열응급주약조체치료,술전급술후균응용목측류비평분법(VAS)평정환자동통정도。결과62례환자균가청석현시각단신경근,3례환자불능학정,수이용신경자격의정위학인,65례균천자성공,성공솔100%,미발현신경손상급기타병발증,술전급술후1주、4주、12주VAS평분분별위(8.65±0.47)、(3.68±0.49)、(2.51±0.32)、(1.73±0.21)분,치료전여치료후각시간점비교,차이균유통계학의의(t치=58.71、86.23、107.72,P치균<0.01)。결론초성인도하비총신경근사빈열응연합조체구유실시인도、안전、무복사등우점,유망재림상상득도추엄。
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulaion in brachial plexus block.MethodsC5-C7 brachial plexus block was performed by 6-13 MHz high-frequency ultrasound probe in 65 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score were compared before and after treatment.ResultsThe brachial plexus was showed clearly in 62 patients; however, 3 patients had to be confi rmed by nerve stimulation positioning. The percentage of successful rate is 100%. There was no operation related nerve injury and other complications. The VAS score of preoperation and 1st, 4th and 12nd week after treatment was 8.67±0.76, 3.58±0.62, 2.46±0.2 and 1.77±0.28, respectively. There were significantly difference between before and after treatment (t=58.71, 6.23, 107.72, allP<0.01).ConclusionThe brachial plexus block using radiofrequency thermocoagulaion combined with ultrasound guidance is a safe and radiation-free treatment and warrants to be promoted in clinical practices.