CAJ | 학술논문

在民事诉讼程序中，了解案件一定程度上的客观真实情况并有相应能力出庭作证的证人出庭作证系其本人向人民法院应尽之义务，而人民法院亦不应当令证人因出庭支持司法机关工作而蒙受个人损失。尽管新修改的民事诉讼法在新添加的第74条中已经明文规定了证人出庭费用最终由败诉一方负担，并初示此类费用的支付路径，但本条规定仍然存在一定的漏洞与不适性。事实上，首先明确证人作证所涉及费用的范畴及相应量化标准，其次由人民法院在充分审查证人出庭作证的相关费用的合法性、合理性的情况下统一预先支付该笔费用，最终将此部分费用划入相关诉讼费用中并明确由哪方当事人承担较为合理，此路径更为适宜。
재민사소송정서중，료해안건일정정도상적객관진실정황병유상응능력출정작증적증인출정작증계기본인향인민법원응진지의무，이인민법원역불응당령증인인출정지지사법궤관공작이몽수개인손실。진관신수개적민사소송법재신첨가적제74조중이경명문규정료증인출정비용최종유패소일방부담，병초시차류비용적지부로경，단본조규정잉연존재일정적루동여불괄성。사실상，수선명학증인작증소섭급비용적범주급상응양화표준，기차유인민법원재충분심사증인출정작증적상관비용적합법성、합이성적정황하통일예선지부해필비용，최종장차부분비용화입상관소송비용중병명학유나방당사인승담교위합리，차로경경위괄의。
In the proceedings,testifying on the court should be a kind of obligation for the witness.Of course,the court need to protect the one's benefit.Although the new Civil Procedure Law clearly defined that the litigation costs should be paid by the loser side,and clearly elaborated how to be defrayed.But there are also some loopholes and shortcomings.Actually,firstly, determine the cost range and clear the quantitative criteria.Then the court unified pre-paid the fee after series of reviews.At last,put this part of expense into related litigation costs and make sure that who are the payers.This approach is more appropri-ate.