中国伤残医学
中國傷殘醫學
중국상잔의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND DISABILITY MEDICINE
2015年
14期
41-42
,共2页
早产儿%口腔运动干预%早期经口喂养%护理
早產兒%口腔運動榦預%早期經口餵養%護理
조산인%구강운동간예%조기경구위양%호리
Premature infants%Oral motor interven-tion%Early enteral feeding%Nursing
目的：研究口腔运动干预护理对早产儿早期经口喂养的影响。方法：选取2013年1月～2013年12月间在我院住院治疗的120例早产儿作为研究对象，并随机分入观察组和对照组，每组各60例患儿。观察组患儿采取口腔运动干预护理和早期经口喂养，对照组患儿仅采用早期经口喂养，观察比较2组患儿的经口喂养效果以评价口腔运动干预护理的疗效。结果：观察组患儿完全经口喂养平均时间为24．71±5．35天，明显短于对照组患儿的28．57±6．41天，其差异有统计学意义（ t＝3．58，p＜0．01）；观察组患儿喂养效率为10．07±0．68mL／min，明显优于对照组的8．90±1．01mL／min，其差异有统计学意义（ t＝7．44，p＜0．01）；观察组患儿喂养成效97．38±4．21％，明显优于对照组的92．48±5．87％，其差异有统计学意义（t＝7．44，p＜0．01）。结论：口腔运动干预护理可以缩短患儿完全经口喂养所需时间，提高喂养效率和喂养成效，具有良好的临床疗效。
目的：研究口腔運動榦預護理對早產兒早期經口餵養的影響。方法：選取2013年1月～2013年12月間在我院住院治療的120例早產兒作為研究對象，併隨機分入觀察組和對照組，每組各60例患兒。觀察組患兒採取口腔運動榦預護理和早期經口餵養，對照組患兒僅採用早期經口餵養，觀察比較2組患兒的經口餵養效果以評價口腔運動榦預護理的療效。結果：觀察組患兒完全經口餵養平均時間為24．71±5．35天，明顯短于對照組患兒的28．57±6．41天，其差異有統計學意義（ t＝3．58，p＜0．01）；觀察組患兒餵養效率為10．07±0．68mL／min，明顯優于對照組的8．90±1．01mL／min，其差異有統計學意義（ t＝7．44，p＜0．01）；觀察組患兒餵養成效97．38±4．21％，明顯優于對照組的92．48±5．87％，其差異有統計學意義（t＝7．44，p＜0．01）。結論：口腔運動榦預護理可以縮短患兒完全經口餵養所需時間，提高餵養效率和餵養成效，具有良好的臨床療效。
목적：연구구강운동간예호리대조산인조기경구위양적영향。방법：선취2013년1월～2013년12월간재아원주원치료적120례조산인작위연구대상，병수궤분입관찰조화대조조，매조각60례환인。관찰조환인채취구강운동간예호리화조기경구위양，대조조환인부채용조기경구위양，관찰비교2조환인적경구위양효과이평개구강운동간예호리적료효。결과：관찰조환인완전경구위양평균시간위24．71±5．35천，명현단우대조조환인적28．57±6．41천，기차이유통계학의의（ t＝3．58，p＜0．01）；관찰조환인위양효솔위10．07±0．68mL／min，명현우우대조조적8．90±1．01mL／min，기차이유통계학의의（ t＝7．44，p＜0．01）；관찰조환인위양성효97．38±4．21％，명현우우대조조적92．48±5．87％，기차이유통계학의의（t＝7．44，p＜0．01）。결론：구강운동간예호리가이축단환인완전경구위양소수시간，제고위양효솔화위양성효，구유량호적림상료효。
Objective:To study the effect of oral motor intervention nursing on premature infants with early oral feeding.Methods:from 2013 January to 2013 year in December in 120 cases of premature infants hospitalized in our hospital as the research object, and were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each group 60 cases.The observation group with oral motor intervention take care and early oral feeding, the control group were only employed for early oral feeding, were compared between the two groups of children with oral feeding effect with the efficacy of nursing evaluation of oral motor intervention.Results:The observation group with complete oral feeding time for an average of 24.71 +5.35d, significantly shorter than the control group children 28.57 +6.41d, the difference was statistically significant ( t=3.58, P<0.01);the observation group with feed efficiency was 10.07 +0.68mL/min, significantly better than the control group of 8.90 +1.01mL/min, the difference was statistically significant ( t=7.44, P <0.01);the observation group with feeding effect (97.38 +4.21)%, significantly better than the control group (92.48 +5.87)%, the difference was statistically significant (t=7.44, P<0.01).Conclusion:Oral motor intervention nursing could shorten the children fully oral feeding time required, improve the feeding efficiency and feeding effect, should have a good clinical effect.
