CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解石家庄机场赴泰国旅客对当地高发传染病的认知现状和个人防护能力情况,为制定高风险航线往来旅客的风险分析方案提供依据。方法采取随机抽样方法,对由石家庄机场赴泰国游的旅客在知情同意的情况下进行面对面的问卷调查,所有资料录入Excel后采用SPSS 13.0软件进行统计分析。结果回收的503份有效调查问卷中,本科学历、收入中等偏上、第一次出境旅游的中青年人群为主体,具有目前出境游人群的代表性；有效问卷中,65.8%的人选择通过旅行社了解赴泰国旅行注意事项；大多数旅客集中选择泰国是“登革热”(42.5%)和“疟疾”(25.2%)的流行区域,而选择“痢疾”和“霍乱”的只占14.1%和11.9%；58.1%的旅客出境前未接种过任何疫苗；23.7%旅客不知道应该到哪里进行旅行前的健康咨询,13.1%不清楚归国后如有发热、皮疹等传染病症状该如何就医。结论评价口岸传染病防控能力现状,逐步构建主动型卫生检疫查验系统；完善风险评估机制,有针对性地对重点航班和人群采取多举措宣教以提升防病意识；应多部门联合持续加强出入境人员的传染病宣教、监测和防控工作。
목적：료해석가장궤장부태국여객대당지고발전염병적인지현상화개인방호능력정황,위제정고풍험항선왕래여객적풍험분석방안제공의거。방법채취수궤추양방법,대유석가장궤장부태국유적여객재지정동의적정황하진행면대면적문권조사,소유자료록입Excel후채용SPSS 13.0연건진행통계분석。결과회수적503빈유효조사문권중,본과학력、수입중등편상、제일차출경여유적중청년인군위주체,구유목전출경유인군적대표성；유효문권중,65.8%적인선택통과여행사료해부태국여행주의사항；대다수여객집중선택태국시“등혁열”(42.5%)화“학질”(25.2%)적류행구역,이선택“이질”화“곽란”적지점14.1%화11.9%；58.1%적여객출경전미접충과임하역묘；23.7%여객불지도응해도나리진행여행전적건강자순,13.1%불청초귀국후여유발열、피진등전염병증상해여하취의。결론평개구안전염병방공능력현상,축보구건주동형위생검역사험계통；완선풍험평고궤제,유침대성지대중점항반화인군채취다거조선교이제승방병의식；응다부문연합지속가강출입경인원적전염병선교、감측화방공공작。
Objective This paper aims to grasp the cognitive status of local high incidence of infectious diseases in Thailand and the personal protection among the exit personnel at Shijiazhuang airport, and to provide a scientific basis for setting risk analysis scheme for the high risk route passengers. Methods Radom sampling is used to se-lect the passengers to Thailand at Shijiazhuang airport. With their informed consent, they are interviewed face to face with the structured - questionnaire. All the data are recorded in Excel and analyzed through SPSS13. 0. Results From 503 qualified questionnaires, most passengers are young and middle -aged people with bachelor degree, average income, and travelling for the first time. 65. 8% choose to understand travel considerations of Thailand through a travel agency. Most travelers choose “dengue fever” (42. 5%) and “malaria” (25. 2%) as Thailand's epidemic disease, and“dysentery” and“cholera” accounts for only 14. 1% and 11. 9%. 58. 1% of the passengers has not been vaccinated before leave the country. 23. 7% of travelers don't know where can get travel health advice before travel, 13. 1% don't know how to get medical help when having any infectious disease symp-toms such as fever, rash after returning. Conclusion The ability of prevention and control on infectious disease should be evaluated, so as to gradually build a system of active healthy quarantine inspection. The risk assessment mechanism should be perfected, and more measures should be taken to enhance the prevention consciousness edu-cation targeted to focus flights and the crowd. More departments should be continued to strengthen education, moni-toring and control of infectious diseases among entry-exit personnel.