中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
15期
78-79
,共2页
凉血解毒法%内服外用%急性痛风性关节炎%效果
涼血解毒法%內服外用%急性痛風性關節炎%效果
량혈해독법%내복외용%급성통풍성관절염%효과
Method of cooling blood and detoxification%Internal and external application%Acute gouty arthritis%Effects
目的：探讨凉血解毒法内服外用治疗急性痛风性关节炎的临床效果。方法：选取我院自2012年6月—2014年6月收治的100例急性痛风性关节炎患者为研究对象。随机分为观察组与对照组，每组各50例。给予对照组口服双氯芬酸钠肠溶片治疗，给予观察组患者凉血解毒法内服外用治疗。对比两组的治疗效果。结果：①治疗7 d后两组BUA、ESR、CRP水平均得到明显改善，且与同组治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。而治疗后观察组的BUA、ESR、CRP降低水平均显著大于对照组，两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。②观察组治疗总有效率明显大于对照组（94.0%＞74.0%）；两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。③两组治疗后均未出现不良反应。结论：与传统西药治疗相比，凉血解毒法内服外用治疗急性痛风性关节炎的效果明显，可有效改善患者关节活动，提高患者生活质量，因此值得临床推广应用。
目的：探討涼血解毒法內服外用治療急性痛風性關節炎的臨床效果。方法：選取我院自2012年6月—2014年6月收治的100例急性痛風性關節炎患者為研究對象。隨機分為觀察組與對照組，每組各50例。給予對照組口服雙氯芬痠鈉腸溶片治療，給予觀察組患者涼血解毒法內服外用治療。對比兩組的治療效果。結果：①治療7 d後兩組BUA、ESR、CRP水平均得到明顯改善，且與同組治療前比較差異具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。而治療後觀察組的BUA、ESR、CRP降低水平均顯著大于對照組，兩組比較差異具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。②觀察組治療總有效率明顯大于對照組（94.0%＞74.0%）；兩組比較差異具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。③兩組治療後均未齣現不良反應。結論：與傳統西藥治療相比，涼血解毒法內服外用治療急性痛風性關節炎的效果明顯，可有效改善患者關節活動，提高患者生活質量，因此值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：탐토량혈해독법내복외용치료급성통풍성관절염적림상효과。방법：선취아원자2012년6월—2014년6월수치적100례급성통풍성관절염환자위연구대상。수궤분위관찰조여대조조，매조각50례。급여대조조구복쌍록분산납장용편치료，급여관찰조환자량혈해독법내복외용치료。대비량조적치료효과。결과：①치료7 d후량조BUA、ESR、CRP수평균득도명현개선，차여동조치료전비교차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。이치료후관찰조적BUA、ESR、CRP강저수평균현저대우대조조，량조비교차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。②관찰조치료총유효솔명현대우대조조（94.0%＞74.0%）；량조비교차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。③량조치료후균미출현불량반응。결론：여전통서약치료상비，량혈해독법내복외용치료급성통풍성관절염적효과명현，가유효개선환자관절활동，제고환자생활질량，인차치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of internal and external method of cooling blood and detoxification in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis.Methods: 100 cases with acute gouty arthritis from June,2012 to June,2014 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 50 cases in each group.The control group was treated with diclofenac sodium enteric-coated tablets, while the observation group was treated with oral topical treatment of cooling blood detoxification method. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results:①After 7 d of treatment, BUA ,ESR,CRP levels were significantly improved, and the difference with the former treatment group was statistically significant (P<0.05). After treatment, BUA, ESR, CRP levels were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).②The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (94.0%> 74.0%); the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05).③After treatment,no adverse reactions happened.Conclusion:Compared with Traditional Western Medicine treatment,the effect of cooling blood and detoxification method has more obvious effect on acute gouty arthritis. It can effectively improve the joint activities to improve the quality of life of patients, which is therefore worthy of clinical application.
