CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比微创血肿淬吸术与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血效果。方法74例患者分为A、B两组，分别行微创血肿淬吸术与开颅血肿清除术治疗。结果A组优良率高于B组，NIHSSS评分、并发症发生率较B组低，P＜0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论微创血肿淬吸术治疗高血压脑出血更为显著。
목적：대비미창혈종쉬흡술여개로혈종청제술치료고혈압뇌출혈효과。방법74례환자분위A、B량조，분별행미창혈종쉬흡술여개로혈종청제술치료。결과A조우량솔고우B조，NIHSSS평분、병발증발생솔교B조저，P＜0.05,차이구유통계학의의。결론미창혈종쉬흡술치료고혈압뇌출혈경위현저。
Objective Compare the effect on minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration and craniotomy evacuation of hematoma in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods 74 patients were divided into A, B groups, respectively for minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration and craniotomy. Results In group A, the excellent and good rate was higher than the group B, NIHSSS score, incidence rate of complications was lower than the B group, P<0.05,had difference statistically sigiifcnance. Conclusion Minimally invasive hematoma quenching aspiration in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage is more signiifcant.