CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探究小切口阑尾炎切除术治疗阑尾炎的疗效。方法选择2012年7月～2014年7月收治的阑尾炎患者68例，分为对照组和观察组，每组各34例。对照组采用传统阑尾切除术，观察组采用小切口阑尾切除术，分析两组疗效情况。结果观察组切口长度、下床活动时间、住院时间及伤口拆线时间优于对照组，P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义；观察组术后感染率、遗留疤痕率低于对照组，P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义。结论小切口阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎切口较小、创伤小，易促进患者术后康复，减少感染和遗留疤痕情况。
목적：탐구소절구란미염절제술치료란미염적료효。방법선택2012년7월～2014년7월수치적란미염환자68례，분위대조조화관찰조，매조각34례。대조조채용전통란미절제술，관찰조채용소절구란미절제술，분석량조료효정황。결과관찰조절구장도、하상활동시간、주원시간급상구탁선시간우우대조조，P＜0.05，차이구유통계학의의；관찰조술후감염솔、유류파흔솔저우대조조，P＜0.05，차이구유통계학의의。결론소절구란미절제술치료란미염절구교소、창상소，역촉진환자술후강복，감소감염화유류파흔정황。
Objective To explore the effect on small incision appendicitis excision of appendicitis. Methods Selected 68 cases with appendicitis from July 2012 to July 2014, divided into the control group and the observation group, each group had 34 cases. The control group adopt conventional appendectomy and the observation group adopt small incision appendectomy, analyzed the situation of two groups. Results The observation group incision length, ambulation time, hospitalization time and time was better than the control group, P<0.05, had difference statistically signiifcance;the observation group postoperative infection and scar rates was lower than the control group, P<0.05, had difference statistically significance. Conclusion Small incision appendectomy treatment of appendicitis has fewer traumas, easy to promote the rehabilitation of patients after surgery, reduce infection and scar situation.