中国美容医学
中國美容醫學
중국미용의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC MEDICINE
2015年
11期
60-62
,共3页
郭云%朱淑萍%沈金翠%王爱玲%邓兰
郭雲%硃淑萍%瀋金翠%王愛玲%鄧蘭
곽운%주숙평%침금취%왕애령%산란
VISIA图像分析系统%强脉冲光%注射除皱%面部皮肤老化
VISIA圖像分析繫統%彊脈遲光%註射除皺%麵部皮膚老化
VISIA도상분석계통%강맥충광%주사제추%면부피부노화
VISIA complexion analysis system%intense pulsed light%injection of anti-wrinkle treatment%facial skin aging
目的:观察VISIA图像分析系统对面部皮肤老化联合治疗前后的定量评价能力。方法:选取36名面部皮肤老化患者行强脉冲光治疗5次(每4周1次),合并A型肉毒毒素注射治疗1~2次。对治疗前后的皮肤相关特征进行检测,将测试结果进行对比分析,并计算差异性。结果:检测面部皮肤老化患者的不同皮肤特征在治疗前后的改善情况各不相同,治疗后面部斑点、毛细血管扩张、毛孔、皱纹较治疗前数值明显升高,两组对比具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:通过VISIA 图像分析系统对皮肤老化患者治疗前、后进行定量分析,可以作为疗效的一个定量衡量标准,在疗效评估上有一定意义。
目的:觀察VISIA圖像分析繫統對麵部皮膚老化聯閤治療前後的定量評價能力。方法:選取36名麵部皮膚老化患者行彊脈遲光治療5次(每4週1次),閤併A型肉毒毒素註射治療1~2次。對治療前後的皮膚相關特徵進行檢測,將測試結果進行對比分析,併計算差異性。結果:檢測麵部皮膚老化患者的不同皮膚特徵在治療前後的改善情況各不相同,治療後麵部斑點、毛細血管擴張、毛孔、皺紋較治療前數值明顯升高,兩組對比具有顯著性差異(P<0.01)。結論:通過VISIA 圖像分析繫統對皮膚老化患者治療前、後進行定量分析,可以作為療效的一箇定量衡量標準,在療效評估上有一定意義。
목적:관찰VISIA도상분석계통대면부피부노화연합치료전후적정량평개능력。방법:선취36명면부피부노화환자행강맥충광치료5차(매4주1차),합병A형육독독소주사치료1~2차。대치료전후적피부상관특정진행검측,장측시결과진행대비분석,병계산차이성。결과:검측면부피부노화환자적불동피부특정재치료전후적개선정황각불상동,치료후면부반점、모세혈관확장、모공、추문교치료전수치명현승고,량조대비구유현저성차이(P<0.01)。결론:통과VISIA 도상분석계통대피부노화환자치료전、후진행정량분석,가이작위료효적일개정량형량표준,재료효평고상유일정의의。
Objective To observe VISIA Complexion Analysis System Quantitative evaluation ability on facial skin aging before and after combined treatment. Methods 36 patients with facial skin aging were selected for intense pulsed light treatment for five times,Once every four weeks,and combined with botulinum toxin injections 1-2 times in the meaning time.Skin related characteristics were detected before and after treatment,and the results were contrastive analyzed and then the differences were calculated. Results The improvement of different skin characteristics detected by VISA in patients with facial skin aging was not identical,the differences were significant before and after treatment(P<0.05). Conclusion VISIA skin detector can be applied for quantitative analysis before and after treatment in the patients with skin aging.The data of spots, red blood,pores,and wrinkles after treatment were obviously higher than before treatment,the contrast of the two groups was significantly different(P<0.01).