中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
18期
122-124
,共3页
高频电剪%会阴侧剪%传统侧剪
高頻電剪%會陰側剪%傳統側剪
고빈전전%회음측전%전통측전
High-frequency electric scissors%Lateral episiotomy cutting%Conventional lateral shear
目的：研究会阴侧剪术中高频电剪与传统侧剪专用工具之间的护理效果差异。方法：本文选择2014年4月-2015年4月来本院自然分娩的产妇226例，采用随机分组的方法，将其分为A组和B组，每组各113例患者。A组使用高频电剪进行侧切护理，B组使用传统手术刀进行侧切护理，比较两种手术器械对护理效果的影响。结果：A组患者Ⅰ度会阴损伤98例，Ⅱ度15例；B组患者Ⅰ度会阴损伤86例，Ⅱ度27例，两组患者均未发生Ⅲ度以上损伤，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。A组患者术后疼痛轻度102例，中度11例，B组患者术后疼痛轻度80例，中度33例，均未发生重度术后疼痛，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：高频电剪更适应会阴侧剪术。
目的：研究會陰側剪術中高頻電剪與傳統側剪專用工具之間的護理效果差異。方法：本文選擇2014年4月-2015年4月來本院自然分娩的產婦226例，採用隨機分組的方法，將其分為A組和B組，每組各113例患者。A組使用高頻電剪進行側切護理，B組使用傳統手術刀進行側切護理，比較兩種手術器械對護理效果的影響。結果：A組患者Ⅰ度會陰損傷98例，Ⅱ度15例；B組患者Ⅰ度會陰損傷86例，Ⅱ度27例，兩組患者均未髮生Ⅲ度以上損傷，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。A組患者術後疼痛輕度102例，中度11例，B組患者術後疼痛輕度80例，中度33例，均未髮生重度術後疼痛，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：高頻電剪更適應會陰側剪術。
목적：연구회음측전술중고빈전전여전통측전전용공구지간적호리효과차이。방법：본문선택2014년4월-2015년4월래본원자연분면적산부226례，채용수궤분조적방법，장기분위A조화B조，매조각113례환자。A조사용고빈전전진행측절호리，B조사용전통수술도진행측절호리，비교량충수술기계대호리효과적영향。결과：A조환자Ⅰ도회음손상98례，Ⅱ도15례；B조환자Ⅰ도회음손상86례，Ⅱ도27례，량조환자균미발생Ⅲ도이상손상，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。A조환자술후동통경도102례，중도11례，B조환자술후동통경도80례，중도33례，균미발생중도술후동통，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：고빈전전경괄응회음측전술。
Objective:To research the difference in nursing effect between the high-frequency electric scissors in the lateral episiotomy cutting and the special tools of conventional lateral shear.Method:226 lying-in women who came to our hospital for natural childbirth were selected from April 2014 to April 2015 and divided into group A and group B,113 cases in each group. The patients in group A were given episiotomy nursing with high-frequency electric scissors while that of group B were given episiotomy nursing with traditional scalpel.The surgical instruments were compared in their influence on nursing effect.Result:In group A,degree Ⅰ perineal trauma of 98 patients,degree Ⅱ perineal trauma of 15 patients;in group B,degree Ⅰ perineal trauma of 86 patients,degree Ⅱ perineal trauma of 27 patients,no patients got injure more than degree Ⅲ,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In group A,102 patients were mild postoperative pain and 11 patients were moderate postoperative pain;in group B,80 patients were mild postoperative pain and 33 patients were moderate postoperative pain, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:High-frequency electric scissor is more suitable for lateral episiotomy cutting.
