中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2015年
23期
3652-3657
,共6页
干细胞%脐带脐血干细胞%脐血间充质干细胞%骨髓间充质干细胞%成骨细胞%诱导分化
榦細胞%臍帶臍血榦細胞%臍血間充質榦細胞%骨髓間充質榦細胞%成骨細胞%誘導分化
간세포%제대제혈간세포%제혈간충질간세포%골수간충질간세포%성골세포%유도분화
Mesenchymal Stem Cells%Fetal Blood%Bone Marrow%Osteoblasts%Cell Differentiation
背景:脐血与骨髓来源的间充质干细胞在一定诱导条件作用下均具有多向分化的能力。目的:比较脐血与骨髓来源间充质干细胞向成骨细胞诱导分化能力的差异。方法:采用密度梯度法分离培养人脐血间充质干细胞和骨髓间充质干细胞,当细胞汇合90%后胰蛋白酶消化传代,取第3代脐血间充质干细胞和骨髓间充质干细胞,以细胞密度为8×104/孔接种,当细胞达80%融合时,加入含体积分数为10%胎牛血清、0.1μmol/L地塞米松、50μmol/L维生素C、10 mmol/Lβ-甘油磷酸钠的低糖型DMEM成骨细胞诱导液培养。结果与结论:两种来源间充质干细胞的形态和生物学特性无明显差异,细胞表面均强表达CD44,CD29,不表达 CD34;两者均具有向成骨细胞诱导分化的潜能,稳定表达了成骨细胞标志性的产物碱性磷酸酶、骨矿化结节,而且两种细胞的成骨活性差异无显著性意义。结果表明脐血和成人骨髓来源间充质干细胞向成骨细胞诱导分化能力相似,均可作为骨组织工程的种子细胞。
揹景:臍血與骨髓來源的間充質榦細胞在一定誘導條件作用下均具有多嚮分化的能力。目的:比較臍血與骨髓來源間充質榦細胞嚮成骨細胞誘導分化能力的差異。方法:採用密度梯度法分離培養人臍血間充質榦細胞和骨髓間充質榦細胞,噹細胞彙閤90%後胰蛋白酶消化傳代,取第3代臍血間充質榦細胞和骨髓間充質榦細胞,以細胞密度為8×104/孔接種,噹細胞達80%融閤時,加入含體積分數為10%胎牛血清、0.1μmol/L地塞米鬆、50μmol/L維生素C、10 mmol/Lβ-甘油燐痠鈉的低糖型DMEM成骨細胞誘導液培養。結果與結論:兩種來源間充質榦細胞的形態和生物學特性無明顯差異,細胞錶麵均彊錶達CD44,CD29,不錶達 CD34;兩者均具有嚮成骨細胞誘導分化的潛能,穩定錶達瞭成骨細胞標誌性的產物堿性燐痠酶、骨礦化結節,而且兩種細胞的成骨活性差異無顯著性意義。結果錶明臍血和成人骨髓來源間充質榦細胞嚮成骨細胞誘導分化能力相似,均可作為骨組織工程的種子細胞。
배경:제혈여골수래원적간충질간세포재일정유도조건작용하균구유다향분화적능력。목적:비교제혈여골수래원간충질간세포향성골세포유도분화능력적차이。방법:채용밀도제도법분리배양인제혈간충질간세포화골수간충질간세포,당세포회합90%후이단백매소화전대,취제3대제혈간충질간세포화골수간충질간세포,이세포밀도위8×104/공접충,당세포체80%융합시,가입함체적분수위10%태우혈청、0.1μmol/L지새미송、50μmol/L유생소C、10 mmol/Lβ-감유린산납적저당형DMEM성골세포유도액배양。결과여결론:량충래원간충질간세포적형태화생물학특성무명현차이,세포표면균강표체CD44,CD29,불표체 CD34;량자균구유향성골세포유도분화적잠능,은정표체료성골세포표지성적산물감성린산매、골광화결절,이차량충세포적성골활성차이무현저성의의。결과표명제혈화성인골수래원간충질간세포향성골세포유도분화능력상사,균가작위골조직공정적충자세포。
BACKGROUND:Mesenchymal stem cels isolated from cord blood and bone marrow have multi-directional differentiation ability under a certain condition of induction. OBJECTIVE:To compare the difference of differentiation of umbilical cord blood and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cels into osteoblasts. METHODS:Human umbilical cord blood and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cels were isolated and cultured by density gradient method. When reached 90% confluency, mesenchymal stem cels were digested by trypsin for subculture. At the third passage, umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cels and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cels at 8×104/wel were incubated. When reached 80% confluency, cels were treated with low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.1 μmol/L dexamethasone, 50 μmol/L vitamin C and 10 mmol/L β-sodium glycerophosphate. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no significant difference in morphology and biological properties of the two kinds of mesenchymal stem cels. Cels were highly expressed CD44, CD29, but did not express CD34. They had the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, which had a positive staining for known markers: alkaline phospatase and calciumin vitro mineralization. There was no significant difference in the activity of osteoblasts of two kinds of cels. Results verify that umbilical cord blood and adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cels can be induced into osteoblasts with a similar ability, and they can be used as seed cels for bone tissue engineering.