中国民族民间医药
中國民族民間醫藥
중국민족민간의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ETHNOMEDICINE AND ETHNOPHARMACY
2015年
12期
71-72
,共2页
黄伙%杨大富%梁华良%陆荣森%梁多%黄广龙
黃夥%楊大富%樑華良%陸榮森%樑多%黃廣龍
황화%양대부%량화량%륙영삼%량다%황엄룡
经尿道等离子前列腺电切术%经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术%前列腺增生%疗效比较
經尿道等離子前列腺電切術%經尿道等離子前列腺剜除術%前列腺增生%療效比較
경뇨도등리자전렬선전절술%경뇨도등리자전렬선완제술%전렬선증생%료효비교
transurethral plasma cutting operation of prostate%transurethral plasma prostate tear in addition to surgery%BPH%clinical curative effect%contrast
目的：对比观察经尿道等离子前列腺电切术和前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生的临床治疗效果差异。方法：选取前列腺增生患者68例，将其随机分为对照组和观察组，每组各34例。对照组使用经尿道等离子前列腺电切术进行治疗，观察组使用经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术进行治疗，观察两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、前列腺切除量、尿管停留时间，并且对患者的生活质量进行评分，比较两组患者治疗的总有效率。结果：经过治疗后，对照组患者治疗的总有效率为79．41％；观察组患者治疗的总有效率为97．06％，P ＜0．05，具有明显差异。手术时间、术中出血量、前列腺切除量、尿管停留时间和生活质量评分情况方面，观察组的优势明显。结论：经尿道等离子前列腺电切术和前列腺剜除术都能够起到治疗的效果，但是经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术的效果更佳，值得临床推广应用。
目的：對比觀察經尿道等離子前列腺電切術和前列腺剜除術治療前列腺增生的臨床治療效果差異。方法：選取前列腺增生患者68例，將其隨機分為對照組和觀察組，每組各34例。對照組使用經尿道等離子前列腺電切術進行治療，觀察組使用經尿道等離子前列腺剜除術進行治療，觀察兩組患者手術時間、術中齣血量、前列腺切除量、尿管停留時間，併且對患者的生活質量進行評分，比較兩組患者治療的總有效率。結果：經過治療後，對照組患者治療的總有效率為79．41％；觀察組患者治療的總有效率為97．06％，P ＜0．05，具有明顯差異。手術時間、術中齣血量、前列腺切除量、尿管停留時間和生活質量評分情況方麵，觀察組的優勢明顯。結論：經尿道等離子前列腺電切術和前列腺剜除術都能夠起到治療的效果，但是經尿道等離子前列腺剜除術的效果更佳，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：대비관찰경뇨도등리자전렬선전절술화전렬선완제술치료전렬선증생적림상치료효과차이。방법：선취전렬선증생환자68례，장기수궤분위대조조화관찰조，매조각34례。대조조사용경뇨도등리자전렬선전절술진행치료，관찰조사용경뇨도등리자전렬선완제술진행치료，관찰량조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、전렬선절제량、뇨관정류시간，병차대환자적생활질량진행평분，비교량조환자치료적총유효솔。결과：경과치료후，대조조환자치료적총유효솔위79．41％；관찰조환자치료적총유효솔위97．06％，P ＜0．05，구유명현차이。수술시간、술중출혈량、전렬선절제량、뇨관정류시간화생활질량평분정황방면，관찰조적우세명현。결론：경뇨도등리자전렬선전절술화전렬선완제술도능구기도치료적효과，단시경뇨도등리자전렬선완제술적효과경가，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To contrast clinical curative effect contrast of BPH by transurethral plasma cutting operation of prostate and transurethral plasma prostate tear in addition to surgery.Method The 68 cases BPH patients were selected,which was to be divided control group and detection group,each group was 34 cases.The control group were transurethral plasma cutting operation of prostate, the detection group were transurethral plasma prostate tear in addition to surgery,the operation time、comparison、prostate removal、the time duration of the ureter of two group were detected,which was the patient's quality of life scores,the curative effect contrast of two groups were contrasted.Result After treatment,patient's quality of life scores,total effective rate of control group was 79.41%;detection group was 79.41%,P <0.05,which was significant sexual differences and statistical significance.The operation time、In-traoperative blood loss、prostate removal、the time duration of the ureter and life quality score,advantage of observation group of pa-tients with more obvious.Conclusion The the effect of the treatment of transurethral plasma cutting operation of prostate and transure-thral plasma prostate tear in addition to surgery are good,but transurethral plasma prostate tear in addition to surgery is obviously, which is to be used.
