实用医院临床杂志
實用醫院臨床雜誌
실용의원림상잡지
PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
2015年
4期
118-119,120
,共3页
杨川%贾绍茂%何丽云%陈贤华%谭首鹏%刘涛涛
楊川%賈紹茂%何麗雲%陳賢華%譚首鵬%劉濤濤
양천%가소무%하려운%진현화%담수붕%류도도
右美托咪定%酰胺类%臂丛神经阻滞%麻醉效果
右美託咪定%酰胺類%臂叢神經阻滯%痳醉效果
우미탁미정%선알류%비총신경조체%마취효과
Dexmedetomidine%Amides%Brachial plexus block%Effect of anesthesia
目的:探讨不同剂量右美托咪定对罗哌卡因臂丛神经阻滞效果的影响。方法100例择期行上肢手术患者按随机数字表法分为罗哌卡因组(R 组)及不同剂量右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因组(RD1~RD4组)共5组各20例。采用超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞,R 组单次注射0.4%罗哌卡因30 ml;RD1~RD4组分别单次注射含右美托咪定0.5μg/kg(RD1组)、0.8μg/kg(RD2组)、1.0μg/kg(RD3组)、1.2μg/kg(RD4组)的0.4%罗哌卡因30 ml。记录各组感觉和运动神经阻滞起效时间、持续时间、术中 Ramsay 镇静评分及心血管事件、呼吸抑制、气胸等不良反应发生情况。结果 RD1~RD4组较 R 组、RD2~RD4组较 RD1组感觉和运动神经阻滞起效时间缩短,持续时间延长,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 Ramsay 镇静评分比较,RD1~RD4组高于 R 组,RD3、RD4组高于 RD1和 RD2组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 RD3组与 RD4组分别有1例和2例出现心动过缓和低血压,其余各组未见不良反应发生。结论右美托咪定0.8μg/kg 混合0.4%罗哌卡因30 ml 可安全、有效地用于臂丛神经阻滞。
目的:探討不同劑量右美託咪定對囉哌卡因臂叢神經阻滯效果的影響。方法100例擇期行上肢手術患者按隨機數字錶法分為囉哌卡因組(R 組)及不同劑量右美託咪定混閤囉哌卡因組(RD1~RD4組)共5組各20例。採用超聲引導下肌間溝臂叢神經阻滯,R 組單次註射0.4%囉哌卡因30 ml;RD1~RD4組分彆單次註射含右美託咪定0.5μg/kg(RD1組)、0.8μg/kg(RD2組)、1.0μg/kg(RD3組)、1.2μg/kg(RD4組)的0.4%囉哌卡因30 ml。記錄各組感覺和運動神經阻滯起效時間、持續時間、術中 Ramsay 鎮靜評分及心血管事件、呼吸抑製、氣胸等不良反應髮生情況。結果 RD1~RD4組較 R 組、RD2~RD4組較 RD1組感覺和運動神經阻滯起效時間縮短,持續時間延長,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05)。 Ramsay 鎮靜評分比較,RD1~RD4組高于 R 組,RD3、RD4組高于 RD1和 RD2組,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05)。 RD3組與 RD4組分彆有1例和2例齣現心動過緩和低血壓,其餘各組未見不良反應髮生。結論右美託咪定0.8μg/kg 混閤0.4%囉哌卡因30 ml 可安全、有效地用于臂叢神經阻滯。
목적:탐토불동제량우미탁미정대라고잡인비총신경조체효과적영향。방법100례택기행상지수술환자안수궤수자표법분위라고잡인조(R 조)급불동제량우미탁미정혼합라고잡인조(RD1~RD4조)공5조각20례。채용초성인도하기간구비총신경조체,R 조단차주사0.4%라고잡인30 ml;RD1~RD4조분별단차주사함우미탁미정0.5μg/kg(RD1조)、0.8μg/kg(RD2조)、1.0μg/kg(RD3조)、1.2μg/kg(RD4조)적0.4%라고잡인30 ml。기록각조감각화운동신경조체기효시간、지속시간、술중 Ramsay 진정평분급심혈관사건、호흡억제、기흉등불량반응발생정황。결과 RD1~RD4조교 R 조、RD2~RD4조교 RD1조감각화운동신경조체기효시간축단,지속시간연장,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05)。 Ramsay 진정평분비교,RD1~RD4조고우 R 조,RD3、RD4조고우 RD1화 RD2조,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05)。 RD3조여 RD4조분별유1례화2례출현심동과완화저혈압,기여각조미견불량반응발생。결론우미탁미정0.8μg/kg 혼합0.4%라고잡인30 ml 가안전、유효지용우비총신경조체。
Objective To investigate the influence of different doses of dexmedetomidine on block effect of ropivacaine brachi -al plexus block.Methods One hundred patients undergoing upper limb operation were divided into ropivacaine group (group R)and ropivacaine mixed with different doses of dexmedetomidine groups (group RD1 ~RD4 ) according to the random number table .Each group had 20 cases.An inter-scalene brachial plexus block was performed guided by ultrasound .In the group R,0.4%ropivacaine 30 ml was injected while 0.4%ropivacaine 30 ml mixed with different doses of dexmedetomidine were injected (0.5 μg/kg in the group RD1 , 0.8 μg/kg in the group RD2 ,1.0 μg/kg in the group RD3 and 1.2 μg/kg in the group RD4 ,respectively).The onset time of sensory and motor nerve block,the time of duration,Ramsay sedation score during operation and the adverse reactions (cardiovascular events,re-spiratory depression and pneumothorax )were compared among the groups .Results The onset time of sensory and motor nerve block in the groups RD1 ~RD4 was shortened and the time of duration time was extended when compared to the group R .Moreover,the onset time in the groups RD2 ~RD4 was shortened and the duration time was extended when compared to the group RD 1 .The differences were statistically significant(P <0.05).Ramsay sedation score in the groups RD 1 ~RD4 was higher than that in the group R ,and the score in the groups RD3 and RD4 was higher than that in the RD 1 and RD2.The differences were also statistically significant (P <0.05).There was one case in the group RD 3 and two cases in the group RD 4 with bradycardia and hypotension during the operation .Conclusion It is safe and effective when use dexmedetomidine 0.8 μg/kg mixed with 0.4%ropivacaine 30 ml in brachial plexus block .