医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2015年
18期
21-21,22
,共2页
低位肛瘘%切开挂线术%切开引流术
低位肛瘺%切開掛線術%切開引流術
저위항루%절개괘선술%절개인류술
Low anal fistula%Incision and thread%Incision and drainage
目的：为了比较切开挂线术、切开引流术、肛瘘剥离结扎术三种手术治疗肛瘘效果，探讨治疗肛瘘手术方式的选择。方法：将60例低位肛瘘患者随机分为3组，每组20例，治疗组（A组）采用肛瘘切开挂线术治疗，对照1组（B组）采用肛瘘切开引流术治疗，对照2组（C组）采用肛瘘剥离结扎术治疗，并比较其疗效。结果：治疗组与两对照组在治愈率、复发率有显著性差异（P＜0.05）。结论：结果表明，切开挂线术治疗肛瘘疗效确切，易于操作；肛瘘剥离结扎术肛门功能损伤较少，复发率较高，有发展的前景。
目的：為瞭比較切開掛線術、切開引流術、肛瘺剝離結扎術三種手術治療肛瘺效果，探討治療肛瘺手術方式的選擇。方法：將60例低位肛瘺患者隨機分為3組，每組20例，治療組（A組）採用肛瘺切開掛線術治療，對照1組（B組）採用肛瘺切開引流術治療，對照2組（C組）採用肛瘺剝離結扎術治療，併比較其療效。結果：治療組與兩對照組在治愈率、複髮率有顯著性差異（P＜0.05）。結論：結果錶明，切開掛線術治療肛瘺療效確切，易于操作；肛瘺剝離結扎術肛門功能損傷較少，複髮率較高，有髮展的前景。
목적：위료비교절개괘선술、절개인류술、항루박리결찰술삼충수술치료항루효과，탐토치료항루수술방식적선택。방법：장60례저위항루환자수궤분위3조，매조20례，치료조（A조）채용항루절개괘선술치료，대조1조（B조）채용항루절개인류술치료，대조2조（C조）채용항루박리결찰술치료，병비교기료효。결과：치료조여량대조조재치유솔、복발솔유현저성차이（P＜0.05）。결론：결과표명，절개괘선술치료항루료효학절，역우조작；항루박리결찰술항문공능손상교소，복발솔교고，유발전적전경。
Objective In order to compare the incision and thread drawing technique, anal fistula, incision and drainage of stripping ligation three kinds of operation treatment of anal fistula, treatment of anal fistula operation mode selection. Methods 60 patients with anal fistula were randomly divided into 3 groups, 20 cases in each group, the treatment group (group A) with anal fistula Seton therapy, control group 1 (group B) with anal fistula incision and drainage for the treatment, control group 2 (group C) by stripping ligation in the treatment of anal fistula, and to compare its efficacy. Results In the treatment group and two in control group in the cure rate, recurrence rate had significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion The results show that, the incision line of the exact curative effect in the treatment of anal fistula, anal fistula is easy to operate;stripping ligation anal function less damage, high recurrence rate, development prospect.
