河北医药
河北醫藥
하북의약
HEBEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
13期
1948-1951
,共4页
汪凡栋%郑佳状%陈宇%张娜%蔡奇霖
汪凡棟%鄭佳狀%陳宇%張娜%蔡奇霖
왕범동%정가상%진우%장나%채기림
后路动态稳定系统%腰椎%退行性病变%手术方法%治疗结果
後路動態穩定繫統%腰椎%退行性病變%手術方法%治療結果
후로동태은정계통%요추%퇴행성병변%수술방법%치료결과
posterior dynamic stabilization system%lumbar degenerative disease%operation method%clinical effect
目的:探讨后路动态稳定系统(Dynesys)治疗腰椎退行性病变的手术方法及临床疗效。方法收治的腰椎退行性病变患者56例分为传统腰椎融合手术组(传统组)和 Dynesys 动态非融合组(Dynesys 组),每组28例。观察2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量,术前与术后12个月、24个月的疗效、VAS 疼痛评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)变化。结果 Dynesys 组的手术时间、术中出血量均显著高于传统主组( P <0.05)。Dynesys 组和传统组术后12个月、24个月的 VAS、ODI 评分较术前组内比较均显著下降( P <0.05);Dynesys 组术后12个月、24个月的 VAS、ODI 评分较传统组下降更加明显( P <0.05)。Dynesys 组的疗效显著优于传统组( P <0.05),Dynesys 组的总有效率高于传统组,但差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。结论采用后路动态稳定系统(Dynesys)治疗腰椎退行性病变较传统方法手术时间短,出血量少,术后效果更理想,值得临床应用推广。
目的:探討後路動態穩定繫統(Dynesys)治療腰椎退行性病變的手術方法及臨床療效。方法收治的腰椎退行性病變患者56例分為傳統腰椎融閤手術組(傳統組)和 Dynesys 動態非融閤組(Dynesys 組),每組28例。觀察2組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量,術前與術後12箇月、24箇月的療效、VAS 疼痛評分、Oswestry 功能障礙指數(ODI)變化。結果 Dynesys 組的手術時間、術中齣血量均顯著高于傳統主組( P <0.05)。Dynesys 組和傳統組術後12箇月、24箇月的 VAS、ODI 評分較術前組內比較均顯著下降( P <0.05);Dynesys 組術後12箇月、24箇月的 VAS、ODI 評分較傳統組下降更加明顯( P <0.05)。Dynesys 組的療效顯著優于傳統組( P <0.05),Dynesys 組的總有效率高于傳統組,但差異無統計學意義( P >0.05)。結論採用後路動態穩定繫統(Dynesys)治療腰椎退行性病變較傳統方法手術時間短,齣血量少,術後效果更理想,值得臨床應用推廣。
목적:탐토후로동태은정계통(Dynesys)치료요추퇴행성병변적수술방법급림상료효。방법수치적요추퇴행성병변환자56례분위전통요추융합수술조(전통조)화 Dynesys 동태비융합조(Dynesys 조),매조28례。관찰2조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량,술전여술후12개월、24개월적료효、VAS 동통평분、Oswestry 공능장애지수(ODI)변화。결과 Dynesys 조적수술시간、술중출혈량균현저고우전통주조( P <0.05)。Dynesys 조화전통조술후12개월、24개월적 VAS、ODI 평분교술전조내비교균현저하강( P <0.05);Dynesys 조술후12개월、24개월적 VAS、ODI 평분교전통조하강경가명현( P <0.05)。Dynesys 조적료효현저우우전통조( P <0.05),Dynesys 조적총유효솔고우전통조,단차이무통계학의의( P >0.05)。결론채용후로동태은정계통(Dynesys)치료요추퇴행성병변교전통방법수술시간단,출혈량소,술후효과경이상,치득림상응용추엄。
Objective To investigate the operation method and clinical effect of posterior dynamic neutralization system(Dynesys)in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Methods By means of random digits table,56 patinets with lumbar degenerative disease who were admitted into our hospital from February 2010 to April 2012 were divided into the traditional lumbar fusion operation group( traditional treatment group)and Dynesys dynamic non-fusion group( Dynesys group),with 28 patients in each group. The operation time,hemorrhage volume during operation,the therapeutic effects before operation and after 12-month,24-month treatment,VAS pain score,Oswestry disability index( ODI)were observed and analyzed for both groups. Results The operation time,hemorrhage volume in Dynesys group were significantly higher than those in traditional treatment group( P < 0. 05). The VAS,ODI score after 12-month,24-month treatment were significantly decreased in both groups,as compared with those before treatment( P < 0. 05),moreover,which in Dynesys group were much more significantly decreased,as compared with those in traditional treatment group( P < 0. 05). The therapeutic effects in Dynesys group were superior to those of traditional treatment group( P < 0. 05). The total effective rate in Dynesys group was higher than that in traditional treatment group,however,there was no significant difference between two groups( P < 0. 05). Conclusion The posterior dynamic stabilization system(Dynesys)is superior to traditional operation method in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease,with shorter operation time,less hemorrhage volume,more satisfactory postoperative effect,so which is worthy of clinical application.