中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2015年
7期
541-543
,共3页
刘志毅%金虎%李亚刚%孙铁梁%谷洋
劉誌毅%金虎%李亞剛%孫鐵樑%穀洋
류지의%금호%리아강%손철량%곡양
胆结石%胆囊切除术,腹腔镜%括约肌切开术,内窥镜
膽結石%膽囊切除術,腹腔鏡%括約肌切開術,內窺鏡
담결석%담낭절제술,복강경%괄약기절개술,내규경
Cholelithiasis%Cholecystectomy,laparoscopic%Sphincterotomy,endoscopic
目的 评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoendoscopy,LC)联合逆行胰胆管造影(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)+十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)一期治疗胆囊结石及胆总管结石的安全性.方法 63例患者分成2组,试验组31例,对照组32例,试验组在全麻下先行ERCP+ EST,取出胆总管结石,之后直接行腹腔镜下胆囊切除术;对照组先在全麻下行ERCP及EST,取出胆总管结石,3~5d后再于全麻下行腹腔镜胆囊切除术.结果 结石清除率分别为96.9%和96.7%,术后肺部感染分别为7.1%(n=2)和16.1%(n=5);平均住院时间(7.5±1.7)d和(12.6±2.5)d,试验组术后肺部感染和平均住院时间对照组明显减少(分别x2=6.203,t =2.74,均P<0.05).结论 LC术中联合EST一期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石,与先行EST,3~5d后再行腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,一样安全、有效,并且肺部感染明显减少,平均住院时间显著缩短.
目的 評價腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(laparoendoscopy,LC)聯閤逆行胰膽管造影(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)+十二指腸乳頭括約肌切開術(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)一期治療膽囊結石及膽總管結石的安全性.方法 63例患者分成2組,試驗組31例,對照組32例,試驗組在全痳下先行ERCP+ EST,取齣膽總管結石,之後直接行腹腔鏡下膽囊切除術;對照組先在全痳下行ERCP及EST,取齣膽總管結石,3~5d後再于全痳下行腹腔鏡膽囊切除術.結果 結石清除率分彆為96.9%和96.7%,術後肺部感染分彆為7.1%(n=2)和16.1%(n=5);平均住院時間(7.5±1.7)d和(12.6±2.5)d,試驗組術後肺部感染和平均住院時間對照組明顯減少(分彆x2=6.203,t =2.74,均P<0.05).結論 LC術中聯閤EST一期治療膽囊結石閤併膽總管結石,與先行EST,3~5d後再行腹腔鏡膽囊切除術相比,一樣安全、有效,併且肺部感染明顯減少,平均住院時間顯著縮短.
목적 평개복강경담낭절제술(laparoendoscopy,LC)연합역행이담관조영(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography,ERCP)+십이지장유두괄약기절개술(endoscopic sphincterotomy,EST)일기치료담낭결석급담총관결석적안전성.방법 63례환자분성2조,시험조31례,대조조32례,시험조재전마하선행ERCP+ EST,취출담총관결석,지후직접행복강경하담낭절제술;대조조선재전마하행ERCP급EST,취출담총관결석,3~5d후재우전마하행복강경담낭절제술.결과 결석청제솔분별위96.9%화96.7%,술후폐부감염분별위7.1%(n=2)화16.1%(n=5);평균주원시간(7.5±1.7)d화(12.6±2.5)d,시험조술후폐부감염화평균주원시간대조조명현감소(분별x2=6.203,t =2.74,균P<0.05).결론 LC술중연합EST일기치료담낭결석합병담총관결석,여선행EST,3~5d후재행복강경담낭절제술상비,일양안전、유효,병차폐부감염명현감소,평균주원시간현저축단.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of one-stage endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of patients who have concurrent gallstones and CBD stones.Methods We conducted a prospective study from Mar 2008 to Nov 2011 in our department.A total of 63 consecutive patients of concurrent gallstones and CBD stones were included and divided into two groups:31 patients in test group first underwent ERCP and EST to remove CBD stones,and then during the same general anesthesia underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) ; while 32 patients in control group first underwent ERCP and ES,and then LC 3-5 days later.Results The stone clearance rate in test group and control group were 96.9% and 96.7% (P > 0.05),respectively.The postoperative lung infection rate in the test group and the control group were 7.1% and 16.1% (P <0.05),respectively.The length of hospital stay (LOS) of the two groups was (7.5 ± 1.7) days and (12.6 ±2.5) days,respectively (P < 0.05).The total expense of hospitalization was (¥) (2 356 ± 126) and (¥) (37 056 ± 152),respectively (P < 0.05).Conclusions One-stage laparoendoscopic management of patients with concurrent gallstones and CBD stones is safe,effective and more economic approach than two-stage treatment for patients suffering from concurrent gall stone and choledocholithiasis.