中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
19期
119-120
,共2页
消化性溃疡%上消化道出血%泮托拉唑%奥美拉唑
消化性潰瘍%上消化道齣血%泮託拉唑%奧美拉唑
소화성궤양%상소화도출혈%반탁랍서%오미랍서
Peptic ulcer%Upper gastrointestinal bleeding%Pantoprazole%Omeprazole
目的：比较泮托拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡致上消化道出血的临床疗效。方法我院消化内科收治的消化性溃疡致上消化道出血患者132例，随机分为观察组和对照组各66例，观察组患者给予泮托拉唑治疗，对照组患者给予奥美拉唑治疗。结果观察组患者总有效率为93.94％。对照组患者总有效率为78.79％。观察组治疗效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。两组患者不良反应发生率的比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡致上消化道出血具有更好的效果，并且不良反应较少。
目的：比較泮託拉唑與奧美拉唑治療消化性潰瘍緻上消化道齣血的臨床療效。方法我院消化內科收治的消化性潰瘍緻上消化道齣血患者132例，隨機分為觀察組和對照組各66例，觀察組患者給予泮託拉唑治療，對照組患者給予奧美拉唑治療。結果觀察組患者總有效率為93.94％。對照組患者總有效率為78.79％。觀察組治療效果優于對照組（P<0.05）。兩組患者不良反應髮生率的比較，差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）。結論泮託拉唑治療消化性潰瘍緻上消化道齣血具有更好的效果，併且不良反應較少。
목적：비교반탁랍서여오미랍서치료소화성궤양치상소화도출혈적림상료효。방법아원소화내과수치적소화성궤양치상소화도출혈환자132례，수궤분위관찰조화대조조각66례，관찰조환자급여반탁랍서치료，대조조환자급여오미랍서치료。결과관찰조환자총유효솔위93.94％。대조조환자총유효솔위78.79％。관찰조치료효과우우대조조（P<0.05）。량조환자불량반응발생솔적비교，차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론반탁랍서치료소화성궤양치상소화도출혈구유경호적효과，병차불량반응교소。
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of pantoprazole and omeprazole in treatment of peptic ulcer caused by upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods In our hospital from department of gastroenterology of peptic ulcer caused by hemorrhage of upper digestive tract of 132 cases of patients,were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group ,66 cases each,the patients in observation group were given pantoprazole and control group were treated with omeprazole.Results The total effective rate was 93.94% in the observation group.The total effective rate was 78.79% in the control group.The effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group(P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P> 0.05).Conclusion Pantoprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer caused by upper digestive tract hemorrhage has better effect,and fewer adverse reactions.
