广州医科大学学报
廣州醫科大學學報
엄주의과대학학보
Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
2015年
3期
45-48
,共4页
杨汉宇%董庆龙%梁丽霞%岑燕遗%刘君%李树本
楊漢宇%董慶龍%樑麗霞%岑燕遺%劉君%李樹本
양한우%동경룡%량려하%잠연유%류군%리수본
自主呼吸%喉罩%气管内插管%胸腔镜%肺大疱
自主呼吸%喉罩%氣管內插管%胸腔鏡%肺大皰
자주호흡%후조%기관내삽관%흉강경%폐대포
Spontaneously breathing%laryngeal mask airway%endotracheal intubation%pulmonary bullae
目的:探讨保留自主呼吸的喉罩全身麻醉在胸腔镜肺大疱切除手术的应用的安全性与可行性。方法:喉罩组与气管插管组各20例肺大疱患者。两组患者均采用全凭静脉麻醉诱导与维持,喉罩组不使用肌松药,插入喉罩术中保留自主呼吸,气管插管组使用肌松药,插入双腔支气管导管。结果:喉罩组与气管插管组的手术视野满意度与术后1h 血气分析结果无差异(P>0.05),喉罩组的麻醉复苏时间[(11.7±3.7)min vs(30.2±9.8)min,P﹤0.05]、住院时间[(4.9±1.4)d vs(7.7±1.8)d,P﹤0.05]较气管插管组短,住院费用[(27243.5±3312.4)元 vs(36721.0±4421.7)元,P﹤0.05]更低。结论:保留自主呼吸的喉罩全身麻醉在胸腔镜肺大疱切除手术中的应用是安全可靠的。
目的:探討保留自主呼吸的喉罩全身痳醉在胸腔鏡肺大皰切除手術的應用的安全性與可行性。方法:喉罩組與氣管插管組各20例肺大皰患者。兩組患者均採用全憑靜脈痳醉誘導與維持,喉罩組不使用肌鬆藥,插入喉罩術中保留自主呼吸,氣管插管組使用肌鬆藥,插入雙腔支氣管導管。結果:喉罩組與氣管插管組的手術視野滿意度與術後1h 血氣分析結果無差異(P>0.05),喉罩組的痳醉複囌時間[(11.7±3.7)min vs(30.2±9.8)min,P﹤0.05]、住院時間[(4.9±1.4)d vs(7.7±1.8)d,P﹤0.05]較氣管插管組短,住院費用[(27243.5±3312.4)元 vs(36721.0±4421.7)元,P﹤0.05]更低。結論:保留自主呼吸的喉罩全身痳醉在胸腔鏡肺大皰切除手術中的應用是安全可靠的。
목적:탐토보류자주호흡적후조전신마취재흉강경폐대포절제수술적응용적안전성여가행성。방법:후조조여기관삽관조각20례폐대포환자。량조환자균채용전빙정맥마취유도여유지,후조조불사용기송약,삽입후조술중보류자주호흡,기관삽관조사용기송약,삽입쌍강지기관도관。결과:후조조여기관삽관조적수술시야만의도여술후1h 혈기분석결과무차이(P>0.05),후조조적마취복소시간[(11.7±3.7)min vs(30.2±9.8)min,P﹤0.05]、주원시간[(4.9±1.4)d vs(7.7±1.8)d,P﹤0.05]교기관삽관조단,주원비용[(27243.5±3312.4)원 vs(36721.0±4421.7)원,P﹤0.05]경저。결론:보류자주호흡적후조전신마취재흉강경폐대포절제수술중적응용시안전가고적。
Objective:To investigate the safety and feasibility of laryngeal mask airway( LMA)with spontaneous breathing under general anesthesia in thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae. Methods:All patients with pulmonary bullae were divided into LMA group and tracheal intubation group(n = 20 each). Both groups were induced and maintained by total intravenous anesthesia. Muscle relaxants were administered in endotracheal intubation group but not in LMA group. LMA group and tracheal intubation group underwent LMA intubation with spontaneous breathing and double-lumen endobronchial intubation,respectively. Results:No significant differences were found in surgical field satisfaction and 1h postoperative blood gas analysis between LMA group and tracheal intubation group(P>0.05). The time for recovery of anaesthesia and hospital stay in LMA group was significantly shorter than those in tracheal intubation group[(11.7±3.7)min vs.(30.2±9.8) min,(4.9±1.4)d vs.(7.7±1.8)d,P﹤0.05],and the hospitalization cast was significantly lower[(27243.5± 3312.4)yuan vs.(36721.0±4421.7)yuan,P﹤0.05]. Conclusion:The application of LMA with spontaneous breathing under general anesthesia in thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae is safe and reliable.