广州医科大学学报
廣州醫科大學學報
엄주의과대학학보
Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
2015年
3期
37-40
,共4页
陈远光%梁剑荣%姜桔红%胡明%雷建
陳遠光%樑劍榮%薑桔紅%鬍明%雷建
진원광%량검영%강길홍%호명%뢰건
直肠癌%经自然腔道内镜外科%全直肠系膜切除%经肛门
直腸癌%經自然腔道內鏡外科%全直腸繫膜切除%經肛門
직장암%경자연강도내경외과%전직장계막절제%경항문
rectal cancer%natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery( NOTES)%total mesorectal excision%transanal
目的:经肛门内镜直肠癌根治术是近年来新兴的经自然腔道内镜外科手术。本研究评价该术标本的直肠系膜完整性,以了解该术的根治性。方法:收集经肛内镜直肠癌根治术与传统腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的手术标本,分别分为经肛内镜组(A 组)与传统腹腔镜组(B 组),比较两组大体标本系膜完整性评分及环周切缘状态的差异。结果:36例直肠癌患者标本,A 组16例,B 组20例。大体评分 A 组2级2例、3级14例;B 组2级2 例、3级18例;差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。环周切缘检查两组各有2例阳性,差异无统计学意义(11.1%比12.5%,P>0.05)。结论:从手术标本直肠系膜完整性来看,经肛内镜直肠癌根治术的根治性和腹腔镜直肠癌根治术无明显差异。
目的:經肛門內鏡直腸癌根治術是近年來新興的經自然腔道內鏡外科手術。本研究評價該術標本的直腸繫膜完整性,以瞭解該術的根治性。方法:收集經肛內鏡直腸癌根治術與傳統腹腔鏡直腸癌根治術的手術標本,分彆分為經肛內鏡組(A 組)與傳統腹腔鏡組(B 組),比較兩組大體標本繫膜完整性評分及環週切緣狀態的差異。結果:36例直腸癌患者標本,A 組16例,B 組20例。大體評分 A 組2級2例、3級14例;B 組2級2 例、3級18例;差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。環週切緣檢查兩組各有2例暘性,差異無統計學意義(11.1%比12.5%,P>0.05)。結論:從手術標本直腸繫膜完整性來看,經肛內鏡直腸癌根治術的根治性和腹腔鏡直腸癌根治術無明顯差異。
목적:경항문내경직장암근치술시근년래신흥적경자연강도내경외과수술。본연구평개해술표본적직장계막완정성,이료해해술적근치성。방법:수집경항내경직장암근치술여전통복강경직장암근치술적수술표본,분별분위경항내경조(A 조)여전통복강경조(B 조),비교량조대체표본계막완정성평분급배주절연상태적차이。결과:36례직장암환자표본,A 조16례,B 조20례。대체평분 A 조2급2례、3급14례;B 조2급2 례、3급18례;차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。배주절연검사량조각유2례양성,차이무통계학의의(11.1%비12.5%,P>0.05)。결론:종수술표본직장계막완정성래간,경항내경직장암근치술적근치성화복강경직장암근치술무명현차이。
Objective:Transanal endoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer has become a novel technique in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)during the recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness of mesorectum in the resected specimen from such procedure as an approach to confirm its oncologic adequacy. Methods:The specimens of transanal endoscopic(group A)and laparoscopic(group B) radical resection for rectal cancer were collected. These specimens were evaluated for completeness of mesorectum and the circumferential margin.Results:A total of 36 specimens( group A,n = 16;group B,n = 20)were collected. Macroscopically,group A consisted of 2 cases of grade 2 and 14 of grade 3 specimens;group B consisted of 2 of grade 2 and 18 of grade 3 specimens,with no statistical difference in the grading(P>0.05). There were two case each in the two groups with circumferential margin positivity(11.1% vs 12.5%,P>0.05). Conclusion:Transanal endoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer can achieve oncologic adequacy as comparable to laparoscopic procedure based on the completeness of mesorectum.