农业环境科学学报
農業環境科學學報
농업배경과학학보
Journal of Agro-Environment Science
2015年
7期
1293-1300
,共8页
刘金%殷宪强%孙慧敏%吕家珑%韦革宏
劉金%慇憲彊%孫慧敏%呂傢瓏%韋革宏
류금%은헌강%손혜민%려가롱%위혁굉
EDDS%EDTA%苎麻%污染土壤%强化修复
EDDS%EDTA%苧痳%汙染土壤%彊化脩複
EDDS%EDTA%저마%오염토양%강화수복
EDDS%EDTA%ramie%contaminated soil%enhanced remediation
为探明施用生物可降解螯合剂乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对苎麻修复重金属污染土壤的效果,通过盆栽试验研究了镉、铅复合污染黄褐土中施加EDTA和EDDS对苎麻生物量、叶片中丙二醛含量及重金属镉、铅积累特性的影响。结果表明:相比单一种植苎麻,施加EDTA和EDDS都能显著增强苎麻植株各部位铅、镉的含量,提升苎麻对土壤中重金属的修复效果。在浓度为1.5~3 mmol·kg-1时,EDDS强化苎麻修复镉的效果较好,土壤镉的去除效率相比对照提高了16%~27%,在更高浓度时,EDTA强化苎麻修复镉的效果较好;EDTA强化苎麻修复土壤铅的效果好于EDDS,对土壤铅的去除效果可提高达22.6%。但EDTA和EDDS的施加会造成苎麻生物量减少,叶片丙二醛含量增加,在同等浓度水平下,EDDS对苎麻生长产生的不利影响要小于EDTA。
為探明施用生物可降解螯閤劑乙二胺二琥珀痠(EDDS)對苧痳脩複重金屬汙染土壤的效果,通過盆栽試驗研究瞭鎘、鉛複閤汙染黃褐土中施加EDTA和EDDS對苧痳生物量、葉片中丙二醛含量及重金屬鎘、鉛積纍特性的影響。結果錶明:相比單一種植苧痳,施加EDTA和EDDS都能顯著增彊苧痳植株各部位鉛、鎘的含量,提升苧痳對土壤中重金屬的脩複效果。在濃度為1.5~3 mmol·kg-1時,EDDS彊化苧痳脩複鎘的效果較好,土壤鎘的去除效率相比對照提高瞭16%~27%,在更高濃度時,EDTA彊化苧痳脩複鎘的效果較好;EDTA彊化苧痳脩複土壤鉛的效果好于EDDS,對土壤鉛的去除效果可提高達22.6%。但EDTA和EDDS的施加會造成苧痳生物量減少,葉片丙二醛含量增加,在同等濃度水平下,EDDS對苧痳生長產生的不利影響要小于EDTA。
위탐명시용생물가강해오합제을이알이호박산(EDDS)대저마수복중금속오염토양적효과,통과분재시험연구료력、연복합오염황갈토중시가EDTA화EDDS대저마생물량、협편중병이철함량급중금속력、연적루특성적영향。결과표명:상비단일충식저마,시가EDTA화EDDS도능현저증강저마식주각부위연、력적함량,제승저마대토양중중금속적수복효과。재농도위1.5~3 mmol·kg-1시,EDDS강화저마수복력적효과교호,토양력적거제효솔상비대조제고료16%~27%,재경고농도시,EDTA강화저마수복력적효과교호;EDTA강화저마수복토양연적효과호우EDDS,대토양연적거제효과가제고체22.6%。단EDTA화EDDS적시가회조성저마생물량감소,협편병이철함량증가,재동등농도수평하,EDDS대저마생장산생적불리영향요소우EDTA。
Ramie(Boehmeria nivea)has showed potential to remediate heavy metal contaminated soils. However, low availability of heavy metals in soils limits the remediation efficiencies. Here a pot experiment was conducted to assess the effects of two chelating agents, ethylene diamine disuccinate(EDDS)and ethylene diamine tetraacetate(EDTA), on the uptake of Cd and Pb by ramie in Cd and Pb contaminated yellow-cinnamon soil. Biomass and malondialdehyde(MDA)content of ramie and concentrations of Cd and Pb in both different parts of ramie and soil were measured. The total content of Cd and Pb in leaf, shoot and root of ramie grown in EDTA and EDDS treated soils in-creased significantly, suggesting the activation of heavy metals in the soils. At 1.5 mmol·kg-1 to 3 mmol·kg-1 of chelating agents, EDDS per-formed better in Cd accumulation than EDTA did, with Cd removal being 16%to 27%greater than the control(no chelating agent). At high-er than 3 mmol·kg-1 of chelating agents, however, ramie with EDTA treatment had higher Cd concentration than that with EDDS. For Pb contaminated soil, EDTA activated Pb better than EDDS did, and the removal efficiency of Pb by ramie increased by up to 22.6%. Applica-tions of both EDTA and EDDS reduced ramie biomass but improved the content of MDA in leaves. However, EDDS showed less adverse ef-fects on ramie than EDTA did at the same concentrations.