国际脑血管病杂志
國際腦血管病雜誌
국제뇌혈관병잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
2015年
6期
444-448
,共5页
陈兰兰%徐俊%朱晓峰%马灿灿%于海龙%景坚%李晓波
陳蘭蘭%徐俊%硃曉峰%馬燦燦%于海龍%景堅%李曉波
진란란%서준%주효봉%마찬찬%우해룡%경견%리효파
卒中,腔隙%颈动脉狭窄%动脉粥样硬化%心房颤动%磁共振成像%危险因素
卒中,腔隙%頸動脈狹窄%動脈粥樣硬化%心房顫動%磁共振成像%危險因素
졸중,강극%경동맥협착%동맥죽양경화%심방전동%자공진성상%위험인소
Stroke,Lacunar%CarotidStenosis%Atherosclerosis%AtrialFibrilation%Magnetic %Resonance Imaging%Risk Factors
目的探讨单发性腔隙性梗死(singlelacunarinfarct,SLI)和同侧多发性腔隙性梗死(multiple lacunar infarct, MLI)的特征以及二者危险因素和病因学的差异。方法回顾性分析2008年8月1日至2014年12月13日期间所有急性颈内动脉供血区脑梗死患者的临床资料,根据临床表现和影像学结果筛选腔隙性梗死,根据弥散加权成像显示的病灶数量和部位分为S LI组、单侧同一血管供血区M LI组( M LI 1组)和单侧不同血管供血区M LI组( M LI 2组)。应用多变量logistic回归分析确定潜在的独立危险因素。结果 MLI 1组同侧颈动脉斑块(73.33%对48.67%;χ2=5.801,P=0.016)、同侧不稳定颈动脉斑块(70.0%对42.5%;χ2=7.192,P=0.007)及同侧颈动脉狭窄≥50%(16.67%对1.77%;χ2=8.327,P=0.004)发生率均显著高于SLI组;MLI 2组心房颤动发生率显著高于SLI组(40.0%对0.88%;χ2=15.887,P<0.001);其余危险因素在各组之间均无显著统计学差异。多变量logistic回归分析显示,心房颤动[优势比(odds ratio, OR)14.452,95%可信区间(confidence interval, CI)1.558~134.011;P=0.019]和同侧颈动脉狭窄≥50%( OR 11.483,95%CI 2.202~59.891;P=0.011)为MLI的独立危险因素。结论 MLI可能具有与SLI不同的危险因素和发病机制。动脉粥样硬化病变和栓塞为M LI的重要发病机制,而S LI则不然。
目的探討單髮性腔隙性梗死(singlelacunarinfarct,SLI)和同側多髮性腔隙性梗死(multiple lacunar infarct, MLI)的特徵以及二者危險因素和病因學的差異。方法迴顧性分析2008年8月1日至2014年12月13日期間所有急性頸內動脈供血區腦梗死患者的臨床資料,根據臨床錶現和影像學結果篩選腔隙性梗死,根據瀰散加權成像顯示的病竈數量和部位分為S LI組、單側同一血管供血區M LI組( M LI 1組)和單側不同血管供血區M LI組( M LI 2組)。應用多變量logistic迴歸分析確定潛在的獨立危險因素。結果 MLI 1組同側頸動脈斑塊(73.33%對48.67%;χ2=5.801,P=0.016)、同側不穩定頸動脈斑塊(70.0%對42.5%;χ2=7.192,P=0.007)及同側頸動脈狹窄≥50%(16.67%對1.77%;χ2=8.327,P=0.004)髮生率均顯著高于SLI組;MLI 2組心房顫動髮生率顯著高于SLI組(40.0%對0.88%;χ2=15.887,P<0.001);其餘危險因素在各組之間均無顯著統計學差異。多變量logistic迴歸分析顯示,心房顫動[優勢比(odds ratio, OR)14.452,95%可信區間(confidence interval, CI)1.558~134.011;P=0.019]和同側頸動脈狹窄≥50%( OR 11.483,95%CI 2.202~59.891;P=0.011)為MLI的獨立危險因素。結論 MLI可能具有與SLI不同的危險因素和髮病機製。動脈粥樣硬化病變和栓塞為M LI的重要髮病機製,而S LI則不然。
목적탐토단발성강극성경사(singlelacunarinfarct,SLI)화동측다발성강극성경사(multiple lacunar infarct, MLI)적특정이급이자위험인소화병인학적차이。방법회고성분석2008년8월1일지2014년12월13일기간소유급성경내동맥공혈구뇌경사환자적림상자료,근거림상표현화영상학결과사선강극성경사,근거미산가권성상현시적병조수량화부위분위S LI조、단측동일혈관공혈구M LI조( M LI 1조)화단측불동혈관공혈구M LI조( M LI 2조)。응용다변량logistic회귀분석학정잠재적독립위험인소。결과 MLI 1조동측경동맥반괴(73.33%대48.67%;χ2=5.801,P=0.016)、동측불은정경동맥반괴(70.0%대42.5%;χ2=7.192,P=0.007)급동측경동맥협착≥50%(16.67%대1.77%;χ2=8.327,P=0.004)발생솔균현저고우SLI조;MLI 2조심방전동발생솔현저고우SLI조(40.0%대0.88%;χ2=15.887,P<0.001);기여위험인소재각조지간균무현저통계학차이。다변량logistic회귀분석현시,심방전동[우세비(odds ratio, OR)14.452,95%가신구간(confidence interval, CI)1.558~134.011;P=0.019]화동측경동맥협착≥50%( OR 11.483,95%CI 2.202~59.891;P=0.011)위MLI적독립위험인소。결론 MLI가능구유여SLI불동적위험인소화발병궤제。동맥죽양경화병변화전새위M LI적중요발병궤제,이S LI칙불연。
ObjectiveToinvestigatethecharacteristicsofsinglelacunarinfarct(SLI)andipsilateral multiple lacunar infarction (MLI), and the differences of risk factors and and pathologies betw een them. Methods The clinical data of al patients w ith cerebral infarction in acute internal carotid artery territory from August 1, 2008 to December 13, 2014 w ere analyzed retrospectively. Lacunar infarctions w ere screened according to the clinical manifestations and imaging findings. The patients w ere divided into a SLI, a unilateral MLI in the same blood supply area (MLI 1) and a unilateral MLI in the different blood supply area (MLI 2) group according to the number and location of the lesions show ed on diffusion w eighted imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis w as used to identify potential independent risk factors. Results The incidences of ipsilateral carotid plaque (73.33%vs.48.67%; χ2 =5.801, P=0.016), ipsilateral unstable carotid plaque ( 70.0%vs.42.5%; χ2 =7.192, P= 0.007 ), and ipsilateral carotid stenosis ≥50%(16.67%vs.1.77%; χ2 =8.327, P=0.004) of the MLI 1 group w ere significantly higher than those of the SLI group; the incidence of atrial fibril ation of the MLI 2 group w as significantly higher than that of the SLI group (40.0%vs.0.88%; χ2=15.887, P<0.001); there w ere no significant differences in the remaining risk factors among each group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that atrial fibrilation (odds ratio [OR] 14.452, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.558-134.011; P=0.019) and ipsilateral carotid stenosis ≥50% (OR 11.483, 95%CI 2.202-59.891; P=0.011) w ere the independent risk factors for MLI. Conclusions MLI may have different risk factors and pathogeneses w ith SLI. Atherosclerotic lesions and embolism are the important pathogeneses of MLI, w hile SLI is not.