中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
20期
142-143,146
,共3页
化痰活血平肝方%中西医结合%顽固性高血压
化痰活血平肝方%中西醫結閤%頑固性高血壓
화담활혈평간방%중서의결합%완고성고혈압
Phlegm-dissolving,blood-activating and liver-calming prescription%Integration of traditional Chinese and western medicine%Refractory hypertension
目的：探讨化痰活血平肝方联合西药治疗顽固性高血压的临床效果。方法选取2013年5月~2014年5月本院收治的100例顽固性高血压患者，将其分为观察组、对照组，每组50例。对照组患者接受西药治疗，观察组患者在对照组基础上联合化痰活血平肝方治疗。比较两组的临床疗效、治疗后的收缩压、舒张压下降值。结果观察组的总有总效率为96.0%，对照组为76.0%，两组比较，差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.61，P<0.01)。观察组治疗后收缩压下降(30.12±9.23)mm Hg，对照组下降(16.13±10.24)mm Hg，两组比较，差异有统计学意义(t=7.18，P<0.01)；观察组治疗后舒张压下降(21.52±8.63)mm Hg，对照组下降(10.42±8.53)mm Hg，两组比较，差异有统计学意义(t=6.47，P<0.01)。结论化痰活血平肝方联合西药能有效治疗顽固性高血压，使收缩压、舒张压明显下降。
目的：探討化痰活血平肝方聯閤西藥治療頑固性高血壓的臨床效果。方法選取2013年5月~2014年5月本院收治的100例頑固性高血壓患者，將其分為觀察組、對照組，每組50例。對照組患者接受西藥治療，觀察組患者在對照組基礎上聯閤化痰活血平肝方治療。比較兩組的臨床療效、治療後的收縮壓、舒張壓下降值。結果觀察組的總有總效率為96.0%，對照組為76.0%，兩組比較，差異有統計學意義(χ2=16.61，P<0.01)。觀察組治療後收縮壓下降(30.12±9.23)mm Hg，對照組下降(16.13±10.24)mm Hg，兩組比較，差異有統計學意義(t=7.18，P<0.01)；觀察組治療後舒張壓下降(21.52±8.63)mm Hg，對照組下降(10.42±8.53)mm Hg，兩組比較，差異有統計學意義(t=6.47，P<0.01)。結論化痰活血平肝方聯閤西藥能有效治療頑固性高血壓，使收縮壓、舒張壓明顯下降。
목적：탐토화담활혈평간방연합서약치료완고성고혈압적림상효과。방법선취2013년5월~2014년5월본원수치적100례완고성고혈압환자，장기분위관찰조、대조조，매조50례。대조조환자접수서약치료，관찰조환자재대조조기출상연합화담활혈평간방치료。비교량조적림상료효、치료후적수축압、서장압하강치。결과관찰조적총유총효솔위96.0%，대조조위76.0%，량조비교，차이유통계학의의(χ2=16.61，P<0.01)。관찰조치료후수축압하강(30.12±9.23)mm Hg，대조조하강(16.13±10.24)mm Hg，량조비교，차이유통계학의의(t=7.18，P<0.01)；관찰조치료후서장압하강(21.52±8.63)mm Hg，대조조하강(10.42±8.53)mm Hg，량조비교，차이유통계학의의(t=6.47，P<0.01)。결론화담활혈평간방연합서약능유효치료완고성고혈압，사수축압、서장압명현하강。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of of phlegm-dissolving,blood-activating and liver-calming pre-scription combined with western medicine in the treatment of refractory hypertension. Methods From May 2013 to May 2014,100 patients with refractory hypertension treated in our hospital were selected and they were divided into observa-tion group and control group,and there were 50 cases in each group.Control group was treated with western medicine, while observation group was treated with phlegm-dissolving,blood-activating and liver-calming prescription on the ba-sis of control group.The clinical efficacy,reduction value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure after treatment between two groups was compared respectively. Results The total effective rate in observation group reached 96.0%,while in the control group,only 76.0%and there was a statistical difference between two groups (χ2=16.61,P<0.01).Systolic pressure was reduced by (30.12±9.23) mm Hg after treatment in observation group,while in control group,the systolic pressure was reduced by (16.13±10.24) mm Hg,which displayed a statistical difference (t=7.18,P<0.01);in observation group,di-astolic blood pressure decreased by (21.52±8.63) mm Hg,while in control group,diastolic blood pressure decreased by (10.42±8.53) mm Hg,which displayed a statistical difference (t=6.47,P<0.01). Conclusion Phlegm-dissolving,blood-acti-vating and liver-calming prescription combined with western medicine can effectively treat refractory hypertension,and can obviously decrease diastolic pressure and systolic pressure.
