中华医院管理杂志
中華醫院管理雜誌
중화의원관리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION
2015年
6期
459-463
,共5页
杨柳%陈晖%闻思源%马晓伟%孟月莉%饶克勤
楊柳%陳暉%聞思源%馬曉偉%孟月莉%饒剋勤
양류%진휘%문사원%마효위%맹월리%요극근
诊疗质量%单病种质量评价模型%ST段抬高型心肌梗死%综合评价
診療質量%單病種質量評價模型%ST段抬高型心肌梗死%綜閤評價
진료질량%단병충질량평개모형%ST단태고형심기경사%종합평개
Diagnosis and treatment quality%Quality evaluation model for a specific disease%STEMI%Comprehensive evaluation
目的 利用ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST EMI)质量评价模型对北京市15家三级医院进行诊疗质量的评价比较.方法 应用文献分析法和专家咨询法构建STEMI质量评价指标体系,运用层次分析法确定各指标的权重系数,在15家医院(H1~H15)进行数据采集,对其指标值进行评价,最终用加权秩和比法对医院的STEMI病例诊疗质量进行综合评价.结果 H1~H15家医院在STEMI病例的诊疗中,其检查检验、患者评估、再灌注治疗、药物治疗水平和临床指南的要求尚有一定差距,甚至某些指标的达标率低于22%;医院间诊疗水平差异度较大;各医院在检查检验、患者评估、再灌注治疗、药物治疗和预后这5个维度上水平较为一致.结论 STEMI质量评价模型能客观全面反映心血管内科的诊疗质量水平,并部分反映医院的整体管理水平,可为医院改进医疗质量提供控制模型的操作方法.
目的 利用ST段抬高型心肌梗死(ST EMI)質量評價模型對北京市15傢三級醫院進行診療質量的評價比較.方法 應用文獻分析法和專傢咨詢法構建STEMI質量評價指標體繫,運用層次分析法確定各指標的權重繫數,在15傢醫院(H1~H15)進行數據採集,對其指標值進行評價,最終用加權秩和比法對醫院的STEMI病例診療質量進行綜閤評價.結果 H1~H15傢醫院在STEMI病例的診療中,其檢查檢驗、患者評估、再灌註治療、藥物治療水平和臨床指南的要求尚有一定差距,甚至某些指標的達標率低于22%;醫院間診療水平差異度較大;各醫院在檢查檢驗、患者評估、再灌註治療、藥物治療和預後這5箇維度上水平較為一緻.結論 STEMI質量評價模型能客觀全麵反映心血管內科的診療質量水平,併部分反映醫院的整體管理水平,可為醫院改進醫療質量提供控製模型的操作方法.
목적 이용ST단태고형심기경사(ST EMI)질량평개모형대북경시15가삼급의원진행진료질량적평개비교.방법 응용문헌분석법화전가자순법구건STEMI질량평개지표체계,운용층차분석법학정각지표적권중계수,재15가의원(H1~H15)진행수거채집,대기지표치진행평개,최종용가권질화비법대의원적STEMI병례진료질량진행종합평개.결과 H1~H15가의원재STEMI병례적진료중,기검사검험、환자평고、재관주치료、약물치료수평화림상지남적요구상유일정차거,심지모사지표적체표솔저우22%;의원간진료수평차이도교대;각의원재검사검험、환자평고、재관주치료、약물치료화예후저5개유도상수평교위일치.결론 STEMI질량평개모형능객관전면반영심혈관내과적진료질량수평,병부분반영의원적정체관리수평,가위의원개진의료질량제공공제모형적조작방법.
Objective To evaluate and compare the diagnosis and treatment quality of 15 tertiary hospitals in Beijing with the quality-evaluation model of STEMI.Methods The quality-evaluation model has been formatted with the document analysis method and expert consultation method,with the indicators weighted by analytic hierarchy process.By collecting the data of 15 hospitals,we can get the values of indicators,then synthetically evaluate and compare the diagnosis and treatment quality at these 15 hospitals with the method of WRSR.Results In the diagnosing and treating the cases of STEMI at the hospitals,gaps are found between the clinical guidelines and the tests,patient evaluation,reperfusion treatment and drug therapy,with some indicators falling even below 22%.Also,there are significant differences in the diagnosis and treatment quality among hospitals.All hospitals are consistent on the five dimensions-tests,patient evaluation,reperfusion treatment,drug therapy and prognosis.Conclusion The quality-evaluation model of STEMI can comprehensively reflect the diagnosis and treatment quality of cardiovascular medicine,and partly reflect hospital's overall management level,so as to provide operating methods in improving hospital diagnosis and treatment quality.