中华医学图书情报杂志
中華醫學圖書情報雜誌
중화의학도서정보잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
2015年
8期
67-72
,共6页
冯鑫媛%张旭日%谷保红%冯媛%苟若燕%田金徽
馮鑫媛%張旭日%穀保紅%馮媛%茍若燕%田金徽
풍흠원%장욱일%곡보홍%풍원%구약연%전금휘
系统评价%Meta分析%学位论文%文献检索%中医药大学
繫統評價%Meta分析%學位論文%文獻檢索%中醫藥大學
계통평개%Meta분석%학위논문%문헌검색%중의약대학
Systematic review%Meta analysis%Dissertation%Literature retrieval%University of traditional Chinese medicine
目的::分析我国中医药大学以“系统评价/Meta分析”冠名的博硕士论文检索现状。方法:检索中国学位论文全文数据库,纳入符合条件的系统评价/Meta分析,提取系统评价的基本资料,输入Excel、SPSS 17.0进行统计分析。结果:最终纳入423篇学位论文,其中71.9%检索了中英文数据库,27.7%只检索了中文数据库,82.8%检索了2个及以上中文库,54.1%检索了2个及以上英文库。检索频率较高的中文数据库依次是CNKI、VIP、CBM、万方数据库,英文库依次是PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE和OVID。结论:目前中医药大学名为“系统评价/Meta分析”的学位论文存在中医药专业数据库使用率低的问题,博士论文和“211”中医药大学学位论文在检索资源和检索结果呈现与硕士论文和非“211”中医药大学学位论文无差异。
目的::分析我國中醫藥大學以“繫統評價/Meta分析”冠名的博碩士論文檢索現狀。方法:檢索中國學位論文全文數據庫,納入符閤條件的繫統評價/Meta分析,提取繫統評價的基本資料,輸入Excel、SPSS 17.0進行統計分析。結果:最終納入423篇學位論文,其中71.9%檢索瞭中英文數據庫,27.7%隻檢索瞭中文數據庫,82.8%檢索瞭2箇及以上中文庫,54.1%檢索瞭2箇及以上英文庫。檢索頻率較高的中文數據庫依次是CNKI、VIP、CBM、萬方數據庫,英文庫依次是PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE和OVID。結論:目前中醫藥大學名為“繫統評價/Meta分析”的學位論文存在中醫藥專業數據庫使用率低的問題,博士論文和“211”中醫藥大學學位論文在檢索資源和檢索結果呈現與碩士論文和非“211”中醫藥大學學位論文無差異。
목적::분석아국중의약대학이“계통평개/Meta분석”관명적박석사논문검색현상。방법:검색중국학위논문전문수거고,납입부합조건적계통평개/Meta분석,제취계통평개적기본자료,수입Excel、SPSS 17.0진행통계분석。결과:최종납입423편학위논문,기중71.9%검색료중영문수거고,27.7%지검색료중문수거고,82.8%검색료2개급이상중문고,54.1%검색료2개급이상영문고。검색빈솔교고적중문수거고의차시CNKI、VIP、CBM、만방수거고,영문고의차시PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE화OVID。결론:목전중의약대학명위“계통평개/Meta분석”적학위논문존재중의약전업수거고사용솔저적문제,박사논문화“211”중의약대학학위논문재검색자원화검색결과정현여석사논문화비“211”중의약대학학위논문무차이。
Objective To analyze the retrieval of master and doctorial dissertations entitled"systematic review/meta analysis" in domestic universities of traditional Chinese medicine. Methods Master and doctorial dissertations entitled"systematic review/meta analysis" in domestic universities of traditional Chinese medicine retrieved from "China Dissertation Full-text Database" were analyzed using Excel and SPSS 17. 0,respectively. Results Of the 423 master and doctorial dissertations included in this study,71. 9% were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases, 27. 7% were retrieved from Chinese databases,82. 8% were retrieved from two or more Chinese databases,54. 1% were retrieved from two or more English databases. The most frequently retrieved Chinese database was CKNI, followed by VIP, CBM and Wanfang. The most frequently retrieved English database was PubMed, followed by Cochrane Library, EMBASE and OVID. Conclusion The low use of traditional Chinese medicine databases is the main prob-lem in retrieval of master and doctorial dissertations entitled"systematic review/meta analysis" in domestic univer-sities of traditional Chinese medicine. No significant difference is found in retrieved doctorial dissertations and mas-ter dissertations between "211"and "non-211" universities of traditional Chinese medicine.