CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨腹腔镜联合中药治疗慢性盆腔炎的效果。方法选择2014年2月~2015年2月，于东莞市南城人民医院妇科诊治的慢性盆腔炎患者98例，将其分为腹腔镜组及腹腔镜联合中药组(联合组)，每组49例。两组均采用腹腔镜手术治疗，腹腔镜组术后不给予中药治疗，联合组于腹腔镜术后给予中药治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后的临床体征积分、临床效果。结果治疗前，腹腔镜组的体征积分为(18.3±0.2)分，联合组为(17.7±0.5)分，治疗后，腹腔镜组为(12.5±0.5)分，联合组为(10.2±0.2)分，两组治疗后的体征积分均较治疗前明显降低，且联合组治疗后的体征积分明显低于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。联合组的总有效率(91.8豫)明显高于腹腔镜组(81.6豫)(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜联合中药治疗慢性盆腔炎的效果优于单纯腹腔镜手术，值得临床推广。
목적：탐토복강경연합중약치료만성분강염적효과。방법선택2014년2월~2015년2월，우동완시남성인민의원부과진치적만성분강염환자98례，장기분위복강경조급복강경연합중약조(연합조)，매조49례。량조균채용복강경수술치료，복강경조술후불급여중약치료，연합조우복강경술후급여중약치료。관찰병비교량조환자치료전후적림상체정적분、림상효과。결과치료전，복강경조적체정적분위(18.3±0.2)분，연합조위(17.7±0.5)분，치료후，복강경조위(12.5±0.5)분，연합조위(10.2±0.2)분，량조치료후적체정적분균교치료전명현강저，차연합조치료후적체정적분명현저우복강경조(P<0.05)。연합조적총유효솔(91.8예)명현고우복강경조(81.6예)(P<0.05)。결론복강경연합중약치료만성분강염적효과우우단순복강경수술，치득림상추엄。
Objective To discuss the effect of laparoscope combined with traditional Chinese medicine treating chronic pelvic inflammatory. Methods From February 2014 to February 2015,98 patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory treated in department of gynaecology of Nancheng People’s Hospital of Dongguan City were selected,and they were di-vided into laparoscope group and laparoscope combined with traditional Chinese medicine group (combined group),and there were 49 cases in each group.Two groups were given laparoscopic surgery treatment,laparoscope group was not giv-en traditional Chinese medicine after surgrey,while combined group was given traditional Chinese medicine treatment after surgery.The clinical sign integral of patients before and after treatment,clinical effect was observed and compared between two groups. Results Before treatment,sign integral of laparoscope group was (18.3±0.2) score,and it was (17.7±0.5) score in combined group;after treatment,above-mentioned score in laparoscope group was (12.5±0.5) score,and it was (10.2±0.2) score in combined group,sign integral of two groups after treatment was lower than that before treatment respectively,and sign integral of combined group after treatment was lower than that of laparoscope group (P<0.05).The effective rate of combined group (91.8%) was higher than that of laparoscope group (81.6%) (P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of laparoscope combined traditional Chinese medicine treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease was better than laparoscope surgery alone,it is worthy of clinical promotion.