中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2015年
20期
34-34,36
,共2页
巨大卵巢囊肿%腹腔镜手术%开腹手术%疗效
巨大卵巢囊腫%腹腔鏡手術%開腹手術%療效
거대란소낭종%복강경수술%개복수술%료효
Giant ovarian cyst%Laparoscopic surgery%Laparotomy%Efifcacy
目的:研究腹腔镜手术对巨大卵巢囊肿的临床治疗效果。方法选取我院在2011年9月至2013年9月进行诊治的巨大卵巢囊肿患者88例为临床对比资料,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,每组44例。对照组患者进行传统的开腹手术摘除囊肿,观察组患者进行腹腔镜手术摘除囊肿,对比两组患者的临床效果。结果在进行不同治疗后,两组患者的病症均有不同程度的改善,其中观察组患者在手术花费时间、出血量、术后离床活动时间、肛门排气时间和住院时间等方面的情况均优于对照组情况。两组差异明显,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对巨大卵巢囊肿患者而言,采用腹腔镜手术形式的疗效更为显著,预后情况更好、安全性更高,值得临床推广使用。
目的:研究腹腔鏡手術對巨大卵巢囊腫的臨床治療效果。方法選取我院在2011年9月至2013年9月進行診治的巨大卵巢囊腫患者88例為臨床對比資料,將其隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組44例。對照組患者進行傳統的開腹手術摘除囊腫,觀察組患者進行腹腔鏡手術摘除囊腫,對比兩組患者的臨床效果。結果在進行不同治療後,兩組患者的病癥均有不同程度的改善,其中觀察組患者在手術花費時間、齣血量、術後離床活動時間、肛門排氣時間和住院時間等方麵的情況均優于對照組情況。兩組差異明顯,具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對巨大卵巢囊腫患者而言,採用腹腔鏡手術形式的療效更為顯著,預後情況更好、安全性更高,值得臨床推廣使用。
목적:연구복강경수술대거대란소낭종적림상치료효과。방법선취아원재2011년9월지2013년9월진행진치적거대란소낭종환자88례위림상대비자료,장기수궤분위관찰조화대조조,매조44례。대조조환자진행전통적개복수술적제낭종,관찰조환자진행복강경수술적제낭종,대비량조환자적림상효과。결과재진행불동치료후,량조환자적병증균유불동정도적개선,기중관찰조환자재수술화비시간、출혈량、술후리상활동시간、항문배기시간화주원시간등방면적정황균우우대조조정황。량조차이명현,구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대거대란소낭종환자이언,채용복강경수술형식적료효경위현저,예후정황경호、안전성경고,치득림상추엄사용。
Objective To investigate the clinical efifcacy of laparoscopic surgery for giant ovarian cyst. Methods 88 cases of patients with giant ovarian cyst for treatment in our hospital from September 2011 to September 2013 were selected. All cases were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each had 44 cases. Patients in control group were taken traditional open surgical for removal of the cyst, while in observe group were taken laparoscopic surgical for removal of the cyst. The clinical effects of two groups were compared. Results After carrying out different treatment, the patient's symptoms in both groups were varying degrees of improved. The surgery time, blood loss, postoperative ambulation time, lfatus time and hospital stay and other aspects of the situation in observation group were better than the control group, differences were statistically signiifcant(P<0.05). Conclusion The efifcacy of laparoscopic surgery for giant ovarian cyst was better. The prognosis was better and more secure. It was worthy of clinical use.