铁道学报
鐵道學報
철도학보
2015年
8期
104-108
,共5页
崔圣爱%郭晨%李福海%叶跃忠
崔聖愛%郭晨%李福海%葉躍忠
최골애%곽신%리복해%협약충
热害隧道%干热和湿热环境%黏结强度%劈裂法%改进的钻芯拉拔法
熱害隧道%榦熱和濕熱環境%黏結彊度%劈裂法%改進的鑽芯拉拔法
열해수도%간열화습열배경%점결강도%벽렬법%개진적찬심랍발법
thermal damage tunnel%hot-dry and hot-humid environment%bond strength%splitting method%im-proved core-drilling and pull-stripping method
本文以隧道热害环境问题为背景,利用模拟热害环境设计和湿喷混凝土技术对热害环境2种强度等级(C25和C30)喷射混凝土与岩石的黏结性能进行试验研究。为保证结果可靠,对岩石大板同时采用劈裂法和改进的钻芯拉拔法(直拉法)测定黏结强度。试验结果表明:相对于标准养护工况,干热环境和湿热环境均引起黏结强度倒缩;2种测定方法测得喷射混凝土(C25、C30)黏结强度随温度的变化趋势一致;劈裂法测定的黏结强度普遍大于钻芯拉拔法测定结果,差值范围5%~15%;2种测定方法各有优点,使用时应尽可能控制对黏结强度测定不利的影响因素。
本文以隧道熱害環境問題為揹景,利用模擬熱害環境設計和濕噴混凝土技術對熱害環境2種彊度等級(C25和C30)噴射混凝土與巖石的黏結性能進行試驗研究。為保證結果可靠,對巖石大闆同時採用劈裂法和改進的鑽芯拉拔法(直拉法)測定黏結彊度。試驗結果錶明:相對于標準養護工況,榦熱環境和濕熱環境均引起黏結彊度倒縮;2種測定方法測得噴射混凝土(C25、C30)黏結彊度隨溫度的變化趨勢一緻;劈裂法測定的黏結彊度普遍大于鑽芯拉拔法測定結果,差值範圍5%~15%;2種測定方法各有優點,使用時應儘可能控製對黏結彊度測定不利的影響因素。
본문이수도열해배경문제위배경,이용모의열해배경설계화습분혼응토기술대열해배경2충강도등급(C25화C30)분사혼응토여암석적점결성능진행시험연구。위보증결과가고,대암석대판동시채용벽렬법화개진적찬심랍발법(직랍법)측정점결강도。시험결과표명:상대우표준양호공황,간열배경화습열배경균인기점결강도도축;2충측정방법측득분사혼응토(C25、C30)점결강도수온도적변화추세일치;벽렬법측정적점결강도보편대우찬심랍발법측정결과,차치범위5%~15%;2충측정방법각유우점,사용시응진가능공제대점결강도측정불리적영향인소。
Against the background of thermal damage environment problem of tunnel ,the experimental study on the bond performance between shotcrete and rock for two kinds of strength grade (C25 and C30) shotcrete was carried out by using simulating thermal damage environment design and wet shotcrete technology .In order to ensure the reliability of experimental result ,the bond strength of the same slab was measured by splitting method and improved core‐drilling and pull‐stripping method at the same time . The experimental results showed that :comparing with standard curing condition ,retraction phenomenon of the bond strength caused by thermal damage was reflected in hot‐dry environment and hot‐humid environment .Based on the results ob‐tained by the two measuring methods ,the changing tendency of the bond strength of C25 or C30 shotcrete was consistent with the change of temperature .The bond strength measured by the splitting method was generally higher than that measured by the core‐drilling and pull‐stripping method ,with difference range of 5% ~15% . As there are respective advantages and disadvantages in the two measuring methods ,adverse affecting factors on the measurement of bond strength should be controlled and reduced as far as possible during the application of the measuring methods .