泰山医学院学报
泰山醫學院學報
태산의학원학보
JOURNAL OF TAISHAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
7期
784-785
,共2页
输卵管近端梗阻%宫腔镜导丝介入%宫腹腔镜联合导丝介入%不孕
輸卵管近耑梗阻%宮腔鏡導絲介入%宮腹腔鏡聯閤導絲介入%不孕
수란관근단경조%궁강경도사개입%궁복강경연합도사개입%불잉
proximal tubal obstruction%hysteroscopy%combined laparoscopy
目的：比较宫腔镜及宫腹腔镜联合在治疗输卵管近端梗阻性不孕中的临床特点及效果。方法回顾性分析2000年1月-2013年12月输卵管近端梗阻性不孕患者共163例，80例接受宫腔镜治疗，83例接受宫腹腔镜联合治疗。比较两组输卵管再通率、临床妊娠率的差别。结果宫腹腔镜联合组输卵管再通率、妊娠率均高于宫腔镜组（P ﹤0.05）。结论宫腹腔镜联合是治疗输卵管近端梗阻的实用、有效的方法。
目的：比較宮腔鏡及宮腹腔鏡聯閤在治療輸卵管近耑梗阻性不孕中的臨床特點及效果。方法迴顧性分析2000年1月-2013年12月輸卵管近耑梗阻性不孕患者共163例，80例接受宮腔鏡治療，83例接受宮腹腔鏡聯閤治療。比較兩組輸卵管再通率、臨床妊娠率的差彆。結果宮腹腔鏡聯閤組輸卵管再通率、妊娠率均高于宮腔鏡組（P ﹤0.05）。結論宮腹腔鏡聯閤是治療輸卵管近耑梗阻的實用、有效的方法。
목적：비교궁강경급궁복강경연합재치료수란관근단경조성불잉중적림상특점급효과。방법회고성분석2000년1월-2013년12월수란관근단경조성불잉환자공163례，80례접수궁강경치료，83례접수궁복강경연합치료。비교량조수란관재통솔、림상임신솔적차별。결과궁복강경연합조수란관재통솔、임신솔균고우궁강경조（P ﹤0.05）。결론궁복강경연합시치료수란관근단경조적실용、유효적방법。
Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between hysteroscopy and the combination with laparoscopy in dealing with proximal tubal obstruction. Methods:A retrospective study we made on 163 patients with infertility of proximal tubal obstruction from January 2000 to December 2013. Eighty patients received hysteroscopy,while 83 received combined hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Age,parity,the duration of infertility,diagnosis rate,recanalization rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared. Results:Patients who received the combination of hysteroscopy and lapa-roscopy showed a higher rate of recanalization and clinical pregnancy(P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion:Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is a valuable tool for the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction.
