中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
20期
66-67
,共2页
腔道介入%直肠微波%前列腺炎%临床疗效
腔道介入%直腸微波%前列腺炎%臨床療效
강도개입%직장미파%전렬선염%림상료효
Cavity intervention%Rectal microwave%Chronic prostatitis%Efficacy
目的：评价慢性前列腺炎(CP)应用腔道介入联合微波技术治疗的效果。方法整群选取2014年3-12月收治的84例CP患者，按照住院单双号随机分为对照组与治疗组，各42例，对照组给予常规治疗，治疗组在此基础上给予腔道介入联合微波热疗治疗，于疗程结束后，对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较。结果治疗组治疗总有效率优于对照组(85.71%/71.43%)，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；治疗后，治疗组患者NIH-CPSI总评分低于治疗前及对照组(P<0.05)；治疗后，治疗组在缓解疼痛不适及生活质量方面优于对照组(P<0.05)，在改善尿路症状方面，两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腔道介入联合直肠微波治疗CP疗效显著，能减轻患者的疼痛不适，提高生活质量。
目的：評價慢性前列腺炎(CP)應用腔道介入聯閤微波技術治療的效果。方法整群選取2014年3-12月收治的84例CP患者，按照住院單雙號隨機分為對照組與治療組，各42例，對照組給予常規治療，治療組在此基礎上給予腔道介入聯閤微波熱療治療，于療程結束後，對兩組患者的治療效果進行比較。結果治療組治療總有效率優于對照組(85.71%/71.43%)，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)；治療後，治療組患者NIH-CPSI總評分低于治療前及對照組(P<0.05)；治療後，治療組在緩解疼痛不適及生活質量方麵優于對照組(P<0.05)，在改善尿路癥狀方麵，兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論腔道介入聯閤直腸微波治療CP療效顯著，能減輕患者的疼痛不適，提高生活質量。
목적：평개만성전렬선염(CP)응용강도개입연합미파기술치료적효과。방법정군선취2014년3-12월수치적84례CP환자，안조주원단쌍호수궤분위대조조여치료조，각42례，대조조급여상규치료，치료조재차기출상급여강도개입연합미파열료치료，우료정결속후，대량조환자적치료효과진행비교。결과치료조치료총유효솔우우대조조(85.71%/71.43%)，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；치료후，치료조환자NIH-CPSI총평분저우치료전급대조조(P<0.05)；치료후，치료조재완해동통불괄급생활질량방면우우대조조(P<0.05)，재개선뇨로증상방면，량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론강도개입연합직장미파치료CP료효현저，능감경환자적동통불괄，제고생활질량。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of cavity intervention combined with microwave technology in the treat-ment of chronic prostatitis (CP). Methods 84 patients with CP admitted in our hospital during March 2014 and December 2014 were randomly divided into control group and observation group according to the number of hospitalization with 42 in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional therapy based on which those in the observation group underwent cavity intervention combined with microwave technology. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results The to-tal effective rate of the observation group was better than that of the control group(85.71%/71.43%), and the difference was statis-tically significant(P<0.05); the total NIH-CPSI score of the observation group after treatment was lower than that before, as well as than that of the control group (P<0.05);after treatment, the pain relief and quality of life in the observation group were superior to those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) ; in terms of the improvement of urinary tract symptoms, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P﹥0.05).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of cavity intervention combined with microwave technology in the treatment of CP is remarkable, which can alleviate the pain and im-prove the quality of life.
