中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
20期
32-34
,共3页
早期%腹腔穿刺置管引流术%重症急性胰腺炎
早期%腹腔穿刺置管引流術%重癥急性胰腺炎
조기%복강천자치관인류술%중증급성이선염
Abdominal puncture and catheter drainage%Traditional operation therapy%Severe acute pancreatitis
目的:探讨腹腔穿刺置管引流术在重症胰腺炎的临床应用价值。方法研究对象为2002年5月-2013年5月该院收治的接受腹腔穿刺或手术治疗的重症胰腺炎患者共58例,其中34例接受腹腔穿刺置管引流术者(设为观察组)和24例接受传统手术治疗者(设为对照组),比较分析两组治疗效果。结果观察组症状消失时间及住院天数均显著短于对照组(t=-4.082及-10.194,P<0.05);且观察组继发腹腔感染发生率及死亡率均显著低于对照组(字2=11.225及6.971,P<0.05);观察组救治无效死亡1例(2.9%),对照组死亡4例(16.7%),观察组死亡率显著低于对照组(字2=6.971,P<0.05)。结论腹腔穿刺置管引流术能显著提高重症急性胰腺炎患者的治疗效果,明显降低继发腹腔感染等并发症发生率及病死率,具有较好的临床应用价值。
目的:探討腹腔穿刺置管引流術在重癥胰腺炎的臨床應用價值。方法研究對象為2002年5月-2013年5月該院收治的接受腹腔穿刺或手術治療的重癥胰腺炎患者共58例,其中34例接受腹腔穿刺置管引流術者(設為觀察組)和24例接受傳統手術治療者(設為對照組),比較分析兩組治療效果。結果觀察組癥狀消失時間及住院天數均顯著短于對照組(t=-4.082及-10.194,P<0.05);且觀察組繼髮腹腔感染髮生率及死亡率均顯著低于對照組(字2=11.225及6.971,P<0.05);觀察組救治無效死亡1例(2.9%),對照組死亡4例(16.7%),觀察組死亡率顯著低于對照組(字2=6.971,P<0.05)。結論腹腔穿刺置管引流術能顯著提高重癥急性胰腺炎患者的治療效果,明顯降低繼髮腹腔感染等併髮癥髮生率及病死率,具有較好的臨床應用價值。
목적:탐토복강천자치관인류술재중증이선염적림상응용개치。방법연구대상위2002년5월-2013년5월해원수치적접수복강천자혹수술치료적중증이선염환자공58례,기중34례접수복강천자치관인류술자(설위관찰조)화24례접수전통수술치료자(설위대조조),비교분석량조치료효과。결과관찰조증상소실시간급주원천수균현저단우대조조(t=-4.082급-10.194,P<0.05);차관찰조계발복강감염발생솔급사망솔균현저저우대조조(자2=11.225급6.971,P<0.05);관찰조구치무효사망1례(2.9%),대조조사망4례(16.7%),관찰조사망솔현저저우대조조(자2=6.971,P<0.05)。결론복강천자치관인류술능현저제고중증급성이선염환자적치료효과,명현강저계발복강감염등병발증발생솔급병사솔,구유교호적림상응용개치。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of abdominal puncture and catheter drainage in severe acute pancreatitis. Methods 58 patients with severe acute pancreatitis who underwent abdominal puncture or traditional operation in our hospital from May 2002 to May 2013 were selected as the research object, 34 of whom received abdominal puncture and catheter drainage were assigned to the observation group, while 24 of whom underwent traditional operation were assigned to the control group. The thera-peutic effects of the two group were compared. Results In the observation group, the symptom disappearance time and hospital stay were significantly shorter than that in control group (t=4.082, 10.194, P<0.05); and the secondary abdominal infection rate and mortality in the observation group were significantly lower than those in control group (χ2=11.225, 6.971,P<0.05); 1 case of death occurred in the observation (2.9%), while 4 cases in the control group (16.7%), and the mortality rate was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (χ2=-6.971,P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with severe acute pancreatitis, abdominal puncture and catheter drainage has better clinical value because it can significantly improve the therapeutic effect by reducing the complications such as secondary abdominal infection and the mortality.can significantly improve the therapeutic effect for patients with severe acute pancreatitis, significantly reduce the secondary intra-abdominal infection complication rate and mortality rate, and has better clinical application value.