中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
20期
27-29
,共3页
开放式%腹股沟疝%修补%腹腔镜%手术%无张力
開放式%腹股溝疝%脩補%腹腔鏡%手術%無張力
개방식%복고구산%수보%복강경%수술%무장력
Open type%Inguinal hernia%Repair%Laparoscope%Surgery%Tension-free
目的:研究比较腹股沟疝采用腹腔镜和开放式无张力修补手术治疗的效果。方法基于手术方式的不同将该院收治的84例腹股沟疝患者分为腹腔镜组和开放式组,两组病例数均为42例,腹腔镜组采用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,开放式组采用开放式无张力修补手术治疗,记录和比较两组患者手术时间、术后下床活动时间、住院天数、2周内恢复非限制性活动情况、并发症发生率以及疼痛分数。结果两组在住院天数、下床活动时间以及疼痛分数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在手术时间、并发症发生率以及2周内恢复非限制性活动情况上比较差异无统计学意义(P跃0.05)。结论在腹股沟疝临床治疗中,腹腔镜与开放式无张力修补术各具优势,均安全且有效,临床实践过程中明确术式时可根据患者自身需求、手术类型以及医师自身经验选择合理的手术方式。但相对于开放式无张力修补手术而言,采用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,可有效缓解疼痛,缩短术后下床活动时间以及住院天数,若条件允许,可优先选用该方法进行治疗。
目的:研究比較腹股溝疝採用腹腔鏡和開放式無張力脩補手術治療的效果。方法基于手術方式的不同將該院收治的84例腹股溝疝患者分為腹腔鏡組和開放式組,兩組病例數均為42例,腹腔鏡組採用腹腔鏡疝脩補術治療,開放式組採用開放式無張力脩補手術治療,記錄和比較兩組患者手術時間、術後下床活動時間、住院天數、2週內恢複非限製性活動情況、併髮癥髮生率以及疼痛分數。結果兩組在住院天數、下床活動時間以及疼痛分數差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);在手術時間、併髮癥髮生率以及2週內恢複非限製性活動情況上比較差異無統計學意義(P躍0.05)。結論在腹股溝疝臨床治療中,腹腔鏡與開放式無張力脩補術各具優勢,均安全且有效,臨床實踐過程中明確術式時可根據患者自身需求、手術類型以及醫師自身經驗選擇閤理的手術方式。但相對于開放式無張力脩補手術而言,採用腹腔鏡疝脩補術治療,可有效緩解疼痛,縮短術後下床活動時間以及住院天數,若條件允許,可優先選用該方法進行治療。
목적:연구비교복고구산채용복강경화개방식무장력수보수술치료적효과。방법기우수술방식적불동장해원수치적84례복고구산환자분위복강경조화개방식조,량조병례수균위42례,복강경조채용복강경산수보술치료,개방식조채용개방식무장력수보수술치료,기록화비교량조환자수술시간、술후하상활동시간、주원천수、2주내회복비한제성활동정황、병발증발생솔이급동통분수。결과량조재주원천수、하상활동시간이급동통분수차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);재수술시간、병발증발생솔이급2주내회복비한제성활동정황상비교차이무통계학의의(P약0.05)。결론재복고구산림상치료중,복강경여개방식무장력수보술각구우세,균안전차유효,림상실천과정중명학술식시가근거환자자신수구、수술류형이급의사자신경험선택합리적수술방식。단상대우개방식무장력수보수술이언,채용복강경산수보술치료,가유효완해동통,축단술후하상활동시간이급주원천수,약조건윤허,가우선선용해방법진행치료。
Objective To compare the effect between laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and open tension-free hernia repair for inguinal hernia. Methods Based on the different methods of surgery of our hospital, 84 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to our hospi-tal were divided into laparoscopic group (n=42) and open group(n=42).Patients in the laparoscopic group were treated with laparo-scopic herniorrhaphy, while those in the open group underwent open tension-free hernia repair. The operation time, postoperative ambulation time, hospitalization days, recovery of unrestricted activity in 2 weeks, complications rate and pain scores of the two groups were recorded and compared. Results There were statistically significant differences between the hospitalization days, am-bulation time and pain scores of the two groups, P<0.05;but there were not between the operation time, complications rate and re-covery of unrestricted activity in 2 weeks, P>0.05.Conclusion In clinical treatment of inguinal hernia, as two safe and effective operation method, both laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and open tension-free hernia repair hold their own advantages. Which one is better depends on the patient's need, operation types and physician's experience. But compared with open tension-free hernia re-pair, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy can effectively alleviate pain, shorten the postoperative ambulation time and hospitalization days, therefore it should be given priority under some conditions.