农业科学与技术(英文版)
農業科學與技術(英文版)
농업과학여기술(영문판)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2015年
7期
1395-1397
,共3页
吴亚维%宋莎%韩秀梅%郑伟%杨华%马玉华
吳亞維%宋莎%韓秀梅%鄭偉%楊華%馬玉華
오아유%송사%한수매%정위%양화%마옥화
八棱海棠%丽江山荆子%水分胁迫
八稜海棠%麗江山荊子%水分脅迫
팔릉해당%려강산형자%수분협박
Malus robusta(Carr.) Rehd.%Malus rocki Rehd.%Water stress
[目的]测定丽江山荆子和八棱海棠2份材料在干旱和复水情况下叶片结构的特征指标。[方法]以丽江山荆子(Malus rockii Rehd.)和八棱海棠(Malus robusta(Carr.)Rehd.)为试验材料,利用大棚自然控水-复水进行模拟水分胁迫处理。[结果]丽江山荆子叶片有2层栅栏组织,而八棱海棠叶片栅栏组织由3层柱状细胞构成,且排列紧密。八棱海棠叶片较丽江山荆子厚,栅海比高,气孔密度大,而丽江山荆子叶片气孔对于水分变化较八棱海棠敏感,干旱复水后气孔面积增加幅度是八棱海棠的10倍。干旱复水后,2份材料叶片的 SR值提高,栅海比下降,八棱海棠2个指标的变化幅度均大于丽江山荆子。[结论]2份材料叶片在干旱-复水水分胁迫的响应不同,八棱海棠叶片抗旱结构特征较丽江山荆子明显。
[目的]測定麗江山荊子和八稜海棠2份材料在榦旱和複水情況下葉片結構的特徵指標。[方法]以麗江山荊子(Malus rockii Rehd.)和八稜海棠(Malus robusta(Carr.)Rehd.)為試驗材料,利用大棚自然控水-複水進行模擬水分脅迫處理。[結果]麗江山荊子葉片有2層柵欄組織,而八稜海棠葉片柵欄組織由3層柱狀細胞構成,且排列緊密。八稜海棠葉片較麗江山荊子厚,柵海比高,氣孔密度大,而麗江山荊子葉片氣孔對于水分變化較八稜海棠敏感,榦旱複水後氣孔麵積增加幅度是八稜海棠的10倍。榦旱複水後,2份材料葉片的 SR值提高,柵海比下降,八稜海棠2箇指標的變化幅度均大于麗江山荊子。[結論]2份材料葉片在榦旱-複水水分脅迫的響應不同,八稜海棠葉片抗旱結構特徵較麗江山荊子明顯。
[목적]측정려강산형자화팔릉해당2빈재료재간한화복수정황하협편결구적특정지표。[방법]이려강산형자(Malus rockii Rehd.)화팔릉해당(Malus robusta(Carr.)Rehd.)위시험재료,이용대붕자연공수-복수진행모의수분협박처리。[결과]려강산형자협편유2층책란조직,이팔릉해당협편책란조직유3층주상세포구성,차배렬긴밀。팔릉해당협편교려강산형자후,책해비고,기공밀도대,이려강산형자협편기공대우수분변화교팔릉해당민감,간한복수후기공면적증가폭도시팔릉해당적10배。간한복수후,2빈재료협편적 SR치제고,책해비하강,팔릉해당2개지표적변화폭도균대우려강산형자。[결론]2빈재료협편재간한-복수수분협박적향응불동,팔릉해당협편항한결구특정교려강산형자명현。
Objective] The aim was to explore leaf structure characters of Malus rocki and Malus robusta at drought and rewatering. [Method] The research used Malus rocki and Malus robusta as test materials to conduct water stress treatment by water control and rewatering. [Result] Malus rocki consists of two layers of pal-isade tissue and Malus robusta consist of three layers of columnar cel s. Leaf of Malus robusta is thicker, and the thickness of leaf palisade tissue-to-the thickness of spongy tissue ratio is higher. ln contrast, leaf stoma of Malus rocki performs more sensitively to water change, and the stoma area after rewatering is 10 times as high as Malus robusta. Besides, after rewatering, SR grows higher, the thickness of leaf palisade tissue-to-the thickness of spongy tissue ratio declines of the two test materials, but the changes of Malus robusta prove more significant. [Conclusion] The two test materials are different in responses to drought and rewatering, and the leaf structure characters of Malus robusta changes obviously than that of Malus rocki during water variation in terms of resisting drought.