中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
21期
69-70
,共2页
前列腺增生%经尿道等离子电切术%效果%评价
前列腺增生%經尿道等離子電切術%效果%評價
전렬선증생%경뇨도등리자전절술%효과%평개
Prostatic hyperplasia%Transurethral resection of the plasma%Effect%Evaluation
目的:分析前列腺增生280例行经尿道等离子电切术治疗的临床效果。方法整群选取2011年11月-2014年11月期间收治于该院的前列腺增生患者560例为研究对象,随机均分成观察组和对照组各280例,其中给予观察组患者行经尿道等离子电切术治疗,对照组行经尿道前列腺电切术治疗。对治疗效果进行回顾性分析。结果在经过不同治疗模式后,观察组患者生活质量评分为(1.87±0.9)分,最大尿流率(24.6±8.3)mL/s;国际前列腺评分(6.4±1.7)分;对照组患者生活质量评分(1.80±0.6)分,最大尿流率(20.3±8.8)mL/s;国际前列腺评分(6.1±1.6)分。观察组明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对于前列腺增生患者而言,选择采用经尿道等离子电切术治疗具有较好的治疗效果,能够取代传统单极电切,在临床中值得推广应用。
目的:分析前列腺增生280例行經尿道等離子電切術治療的臨床效果。方法整群選取2011年11月-2014年11月期間收治于該院的前列腺增生患者560例為研究對象,隨機均分成觀察組和對照組各280例,其中給予觀察組患者行經尿道等離子電切術治療,對照組行經尿道前列腺電切術治療。對治療效果進行迴顧性分析。結果在經過不同治療模式後,觀察組患者生活質量評分為(1.87±0.9)分,最大尿流率(24.6±8.3)mL/s;國際前列腺評分(6.4±1.7)分;對照組患者生活質量評分(1.80±0.6)分,最大尿流率(20.3±8.8)mL/s;國際前列腺評分(6.1±1.6)分。觀察組明顯優于對照組(P<0.05)。結論針對于前列腺增生患者而言,選擇採用經尿道等離子電切術治療具有較好的治療效果,能夠取代傳統單極電切,在臨床中值得推廣應用。
목적:분석전렬선증생280례행경뇨도등리자전절술치료적림상효과。방법정군선취2011년11월-2014년11월기간수치우해원적전렬선증생환자560례위연구대상,수궤균분성관찰조화대조조각280례,기중급여관찰조환자행경뇨도등리자전절술치료,대조조행경뇨도전렬선전절술치료。대치료효과진행회고성분석。결과재경과불동치료모식후,관찰조환자생활질량평분위(1.87±0.9)분,최대뇨류솔(24.6±8.3)mL/s;국제전렬선평분(6.4±1.7)분;대조조환자생활질량평분(1.80±0.6)분,최대뇨류솔(20.3±8.8)mL/s;국제전렬선평분(6.1±1.6)분。관찰조명현우우대조조(P<0.05)。결론침대우전렬선증생환자이언,선택채용경뇨도등리자전절술치료구유교호적치료효과,능구취대전통단겁전절,재림상중치득추엄응용。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate in the treatment of prostat-ic hyperplasia in 280 cases. Methods 560 patients with prostatic hyperplasia admitted in our hospital during November 2011 and November 2014 were selected as the research object and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 280 in each group. The patients in the observation group were treated with transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate, while those in the control group underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. The treatment effects were were retrospectively analyzed. Results After treatment by different methods, the quality of life score, maximal urinary flow rate and international prostatic symp-tom score in the observation group and those in the control group were 1.87±0.9,(24.6±8.3)ml/s, 6.4±1.7and 1.80±0.6,(20.3±8.8)ml/s, (6.1±1.6), respectively, and the observation groups was significantly superior to the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with prostatic hyperplasia, transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate has better effect, therefore it can be used in clinical practice by taking the place of traditional monoploar transurethral resection of the prostate.