中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)
中華危重癥醫學雜誌(電子版)
중화위중증의학잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE ( ELECTRONIC EDITON)
2015年
2期
100-103
,共4页
王倩%周华玲%张东东%李强
王倩%週華玲%張東東%李彊
왕천%주화령%장동동%리강
胃肿瘤%双重超声造影%T分期
胃腫瘤%雙重超聲造影%T分期
위종류%쌍중초성조영%T분기
Stomach neoplasms%Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography%T stage
目的:分析双重超声造影在胃癌术前分期的诊断意义。方法选择166例胃癌患者为纳入研究,术前对其行双重超声造影检查,分别用胃窗超声造影与双重超声造影结果进行术前分期,精确分期以术后病理检查结果为准。结果双重超声造影T分期诊断符合率(82.2%)高于胃窗超声造影术前T分期(60.1%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.499,P<0.05)。双重超声造影T1、T2、T3、T4诊断符合率分别为88.9%,82.8%,86.0%,88.7%,其中T2、T3和T4分期双重造影诊断符合率优于胃窗超声造影,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.340、4.150、11.257,P=0.011、0.042、0.001)。结论超声双重造影对胃癌术前分期有一定的临床价值。
目的:分析雙重超聲造影在胃癌術前分期的診斷意義。方法選擇166例胃癌患者為納入研究,術前對其行雙重超聲造影檢查,分彆用胃窗超聲造影與雙重超聲造影結果進行術前分期,精確分期以術後病理檢查結果為準。結果雙重超聲造影T分期診斷符閤率(82.2%)高于胃窗超聲造影術前T分期(60.1%),差異有統計學意義(χ2=25.499,P<0.05)。雙重超聲造影T1、T2、T3、T4診斷符閤率分彆為88.9%,82.8%,86.0%,88.7%,其中T2、T3和T4分期雙重造影診斷符閤率優于胃窗超聲造影,差異有統計學意義(χ2=6.340、4.150、11.257,P=0.011、0.042、0.001)。結論超聲雙重造影對胃癌術前分期有一定的臨床價值。
목적:분석쌍중초성조영재위암술전분기적진단의의。방법선택166례위암환자위납입연구,술전대기행쌍중초성조영검사,분별용위창초성조영여쌍중초성조영결과진행술전분기,정학분기이술후병리검사결과위준。결과쌍중초성조영T분기진단부합솔(82.2%)고우위창초성조영술전T분기(60.1%),차이유통계학의의(χ2=25.499,P<0.05)。쌍중초성조영T1、T2、T3、T4진단부합솔분별위88.9%,82.8%,86.0%,88.7%,기중T2、T3화T4분기쌍중조영진단부합솔우우위창초성조영,차이유통계학의의(χ2=6.340、4.150、11.257,P=0.011、0.042、0.001)。결론초성쌍중조영대위암술전분기유일정적림상개치。
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of double contrast-enh anced ultrasonography (DUCS) in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer. Methods A total of 166 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. All the cases have been preoperatively evaluated with the DUCS before the surgery. The diagnostic accuracy of oral ultrasonic contrast agent or DUCS for TNM staging of gastric cancer was determined by subsequent postoperative histopathologic findings. Results The overall accuracy of total T stage of DUCS was statistically higher than the oral ultrasonic contrast agent( 82.2%vs 60.1%, χ2=25.499, P < 0.05), while the accuracy of T1, T2, T3 and T4 stage was 88.9%, 82.8%, 86.0% and 88.7%, respectively. Compared with the oral ultrasonic contrast agent, the accuracy of T2, T3 and T4 stage of DUCS were obviously higher ( χ2= 6.340, 4.150, 11.257; P = 0.011, 0.042, 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The DUCS might have some clinical value on evaluating the preoperative T stage of gastric cancer.