金刚石与磨料磨具工程
金剛石與磨料磨具工程
금강석여마료마구공정
DIAMOND & ABRASIVES ENGINNERING
2015年
4期
1-5,10
,共6页
邓福铭%陈立%刘畅%邓雯丽%雷青%赵烨%吕少宁
鄧福銘%陳立%劉暢%鄧雯麗%雷青%趙燁%呂少寧
산복명%진립%류창%산문려%뢰청%조엽%려소저
化学气相沉积%金刚石复合涂层%切削性能%磨损
化學氣相沉積%金剛石複閤塗層%切削性能%磨損
화학기상침적%금강석복합도층%절삭성능%마손
chemical vapor deposition%diamond composite coating%cutting property%wear
利用化学气相沉积(chemical vapor deposition,CVD)法在硬质合金上制备纳米、微米以及微/纳米复合金刚石涂层,并进行了切削对比试验。通过测试已加工材料的表面粗糙度和金刚石涂层刀具前、后刀面磨损,对比分析了不同金刚石涂层的切削性能,同时总结了 CVD 金刚石涂层刀具的失效形式及机理。结果表明:纳米金刚石涂层刀具切削加工后的表面粗糙度值最小,R a =0.942μm;微米金刚石涂层刀具切削加工表面粗糙度值最大,R a =1.631μm;纳米涂层刀具的后刀面磨损最大,约为微米涂层的2倍,复合涂层的5倍;微/纳米复合金刚石涂层刀具膜/基结合力高,前、后刀面的金刚石涂层没有出现脱落,且刀具的磨损量较少;金刚石涂层刀具的主要失效形式是涂层的过早脱落,其失效主要是由金刚石涂层的残余应力大、涂层化学纯度低、内部产生微裂纹多,以及切削时表面粗糙度高、切削力大和刀具积屑瘤普遍等原因引起的。
利用化學氣相沉積(chemical vapor deposition,CVD)法在硬質閤金上製備納米、微米以及微/納米複閤金剛石塗層,併進行瞭切削對比試驗。通過測試已加工材料的錶麵粗糙度和金剛石塗層刀具前、後刀麵磨損,對比分析瞭不同金剛石塗層的切削性能,同時總結瞭 CVD 金剛石塗層刀具的失效形式及機理。結果錶明:納米金剛石塗層刀具切削加工後的錶麵粗糙度值最小,R a =0.942μm;微米金剛石塗層刀具切削加工錶麵粗糙度值最大,R a =1.631μm;納米塗層刀具的後刀麵磨損最大,約為微米塗層的2倍,複閤塗層的5倍;微/納米複閤金剛石塗層刀具膜/基結閤力高,前、後刀麵的金剛石塗層沒有齣現脫落,且刀具的磨損量較少;金剛石塗層刀具的主要失效形式是塗層的過早脫落,其失效主要是由金剛石塗層的殘餘應力大、塗層化學純度低、內部產生微裂紋多,以及切削時錶麵粗糙度高、切削力大和刀具積屑瘤普遍等原因引起的。
이용화학기상침적(chemical vapor deposition,CVD)법재경질합금상제비납미、미미이급미/납미복합금강석도층,병진행료절삭대비시험。통과측시이가공재료적표면조조도화금강석도층도구전、후도면마손,대비분석료불동금강석도층적절삭성능,동시총결료 CVD 금강석도층도구적실효형식급궤리。결과표명:납미금강석도층도구절삭가공후적표면조조도치최소,R a =0.942μm;미미금강석도층도구절삭가공표면조조도치최대,R a =1.631μm;납미도층도구적후도면마손최대,약위미미도층적2배,복합도층적5배;미/납미복합금강석도층도구막/기결합력고,전、후도면적금강석도층몰유출현탈락,차도구적마손량교소;금강석도층도구적주요실효형식시도층적과조탈락,기실효주요시유금강석도층적잔여응력대、도층화학순도저、내부산생미렬문다,이급절삭시표면조조도고、절삭력대화도구적설류보편등원인인기적。
Chemical vapor deposition method was used to deposit micro-,nano-,and micro∕nano-diamond coatings on cemented carbide substrates,and then the cutting properties were tested.Based on the machined surface roughness and flank and rake wear of diamond coated tools,cutting properties of different diamond coatings were analyzed and failure forms and mechanisms were summarized.The results showed that the roughness of the surface machined with nano diamond coated tools was the smallest(R a =0.942 μm) and that the roughness of the surface machined with micro diamond coated tools was the biggest (R a = 1.631 μm).It was also showed that nano diamond coated tools had the largest flank wear,land width of which was about 2 times and 5 times larger than those of micro diamond coated tools and micro∕nano diamond coated tools respectively.In addition,the interfacial adhesion strength of micro∕nano diamond coating was better,so the diamond film did not exfoliate and wore less.The main failure form of diamond film coated tools was coating premature exfoliation,and the failure mechanism was mainly due to big residual stress,low chemical purity,severe internal cracks,high surface roughness and high cutting force,as well as the built-up edge.