中国继续医学教育
中國繼續醫學教育
중국계속의학교육
CHINA CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
2015年
20期
132-133
,共2页
小切口%标准切口%食道癌
小切口%標準切口%食道癌
소절구%표준절구%식도암
Small incision%Standard incision%Esophageal cancer
目的：分析小切口和标准后胸切口开胸治疗食道癌的临床效果。方法选取收治的食道癌患者76例，将其随机分为观察组（小切口手术）与对照组（标准后胸开胸手术），比较两组患者治疗效果。结果观察组术中及术后情况均优于对照组（P＜0.05）；且并发症发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论小切口胸段食管癌根治术治疗食道癌的临床效果显著。
目的：分析小切口和標準後胸切口開胸治療食道癌的臨床效果。方法選取收治的食道癌患者76例，將其隨機分為觀察組（小切口手術）與對照組（標準後胸開胸手術），比較兩組患者治療效果。結果觀察組術中及術後情況均優于對照組（P＜0.05）；且併髮癥髮生率低于對照組（P＜0.05）。結論小切口胸段食管癌根治術治療食道癌的臨床效果顯著。
목적：분석소절구화표준후흉절구개흉치료식도암적림상효과。방법선취수치적식도암환자76례，장기수궤분위관찰조（소절구수술）여대조조（표준후흉개흉수술），비교량조환자치료효과。결과관찰조술중급술후정황균우우대조조（P＜0.05）；차병발증발생솔저우대조조（P＜0.05）。결론소절구흉단식관암근치술치료식도암적림상효과현저。
Objective To analyze small incision and the standard clinical effect after chest incision thoracotomy esophageal cancer treatment. Methods 76 patients with esophageal cancer were treated, were randomly divided into two groups (small incision) and control group (chest thoracotomy after standard), were compared in patients with treatment. Results The intraoperative and postoperative conditions were better than in the control group (P<0.05), and the complication rate is lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The small incision thoracic esophageal resection of esophageal cancer clinical effect is signiifcant.
