CAJ | 학술논문

目的：构建医学院校本科毕业论文质量评价标准。方法采用德尔菲法经过两轮专家咨询确定本科毕业论文抽检质量评价标准。结果两轮咨询专家的积极系数分别为88.24%、86.67%；权威系数分别为0.885、0.895；最终的专家协调系数为0.402。确定的评价标准包括4项一级指标、13项二级指标。结论专家的积极程度和权威程度较高，两轮咨询后专家的意见已经趋于一致。
목적：구건의학원교본과필업논문질량평개표준。방법채용덕이비법경과량륜전가자순학정본과필업논문추검질량평개표준。결과량륜자순전가적적겁계수분별위88.24%、86.67%；권위계수분별위0.885、0.895；최종적전가협조계수위0.402。학정적평개표준포괄4항일급지표、13항이급지표。결론전가적적겁정도화권위정도교고，량륜자순후전가적의견이경추우일치。
Objective To establish the quality evaluation system of undergraduate thesis in medical college. Methods Two rounds of Delphi consultation were carried out to determine the evaluating indicators. Results The active coefficient of experts in the two rounds of delphi consultation were 88.24%and 86.67%respectively, the two rounds of the degree of specialist authority were 0.885 and 0.895 respectively, the ifnal coordination coefifcient of the specialists' opinion were 0.402. The quality evaluation system was established including 4 ifrst grade indexes, 13 second grade indexes. Conclusion Higher degree and extent of the authority of the positive conclusions of experts, after two rounds of expert advice has converge.