CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析比较传统B超与彩色多普勒超声对剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠患者的检测结果及诊断指导价值。方法筛选我院自2012年1月～2015年1月收治的120例剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠患者，按照随机数表法均分为实验组和对照组分组检测，并统计分析结果，比较两组诊断率、治疗选择方案及术后并发症。结果根据评定标准，结果显示实验组剖宫产率93.3%，高于对照组剖宫产率83.3%，组间差异有统计学意义（P﹤0.05）；实验组顺产并发症发生率为40%，低于对照组顺产并发症发生率69.2%，组间差异有统计学意义（P﹤0.05）。结论多普勒彩超检测剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠患者的临床效果高于传统B超，值得推广应用。
목적：분석비교전통B초여채색다보륵초성대부궁산술후반흔자궁임신환자적검측결과급진단지도개치。방법사선아원자2012년1월～2015년1월수치적120례부궁산술후반흔자궁임신환자，안조수궤수표법균분위실험조화대조조분조검측，병통계분석결과，비교량조진단솔、치료선택방안급술후병발증。결과근거평정표준，결과현시실험조부궁산솔93.3%，고우대조조부궁산솔83.3%，조간차이유통계학의의（P﹤0.05）；실험조순산병발증발생솔위40%，저우대조조순산병발증발생솔69.2%，조간차이유통계학의의（P﹤0.05）。결론다보륵채초검측부궁산술후반흔자궁임신환자적림상효과고우전통B초，치득추엄응용。
Objective To compare the diagnosis guide value between traditional B ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound for the cesarean scar pregnancy in a patient.Methods 120 cases of scarred uterus pregnancy from Jan 2012 to Jan 2014, who were <br> divided into 2 groups, according to a random number table and collected the dates of diagnosis rate between the two groups, treatment options and complications.Results According to the evaluation criteria, the results showed that the cesarean rate of experimental group was 93.3%,which was higher than it was 83.3% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ﹤0.05); the experimental group birth complication rate was 40%, lower than it was 69.2% in the control group, which difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P ﹤0.05).Conclusion The clinical <br> effects of Doppler ultrasound to detect pregnancy in cesarean scar patients than traditional B ultrasound, should be widely applied.