CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析并比较X线、CT及MR三种影像诊断技术在肩锁关节脱位诊断中的应用价值。方法随机选取肩锁关节脱位患者121例，对其采取X线、CT及MR三种影像诊断技术进行诊断。结束后比较三种诊断技术的效果。结果 X线检查显示符合诊断的90例(74.4%)，漏诊8例(6.6%)，误诊23例(19.0%)；CT检查显示符合诊断104例(86.0%)，漏诊12例(9.9%)，误诊5例(4.1%)；MR诊断显示符合诊断116例(95.9%)，漏诊5例(4.1%)，误诊0例；三种技术诊断率进行差异比较(χ2=6.82，P<0.05)，差异显著。结论 X线、CT及MR三种影像诊断技术中，较为有效和可靠性高的为MR技术，在临床诊断中推荐使用。
목적：분석병비교X선、CT급MR삼충영상진단기술재견쇄관절탈위진단중적응용개치。방법수궤선취견쇄관절탈위환자121례，대기채취X선、CT급MR삼충영상진단기술진행진단。결속후비교삼충진단기술적효과。결과 X선검사현시부합진단적90례(74.4%)，루진8례(6.6%)，오진23례(19.0%)；CT검사현시부합진단104례(86.0%)，루진12례(9.9%)，오진5례(4.1%)；MR진단현시부합진단116례(95.9%)，루진5례(4.1%)，오진0례；삼충기술진단솔진행차이비교(χ2=6.82，P<0.05)，차이현저。결론 X선、CT급MR삼충영상진단기술중，교위유효화가고성고적위MR기술，재림상진단중추천사용。
Objective:To analyze and compare the X-ray, CT and MR imaging diagnostic technology in three applications in the acromioclavicular joint dislocation diagnosis.Methods: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation randomly selected 121 patients, diagnose their take X-ray, CT and MR imaging diagnostic technology in three. After comparison of three different diagnostic techniques.Results:X-ray examination to demonstrate compliance with 90 cases (74.4%), missed eight cases diagnosed (6.6%) were misdiagnosed 23 cases (19.0%); CT examination showed consistent with the diagnosis 104 cases (86.0 percent), missed 12 cases (9.9% ), 5 cases of misdiagnosis (4.1%); MR diagnosis demonstrate compliance with 116 cases (95.9 percent), missed five cases (4.1%), misdiagnosed 0 cases; three techniques diagnosis rates were compared (χ2 = 6.82,P <0.05 ), a significant difference. Conclusion:X-ray, CT and MR imaging diagnosis of the three techniques, more effective and high reliability of MR technology in clinical diagnosis recommended.