农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
15期
114-123
,共10页
郭明明%王文龙%李建明%朱宝才%史倩华%康宏亮%李艳富%李垚林
郭明明%王文龍%李建明%硃寶纔%史倩華%康宏亮%李豔富%李垚林
곽명명%왕문룡%리건명%주보재%사천화%강굉량%리염부%리요림
耕作%径流%产沙%黄土区%坡耕地%浅沟%形态特征
耕作%徑流%產沙%黃土區%坡耕地%淺溝%形態特徵
경작%경류%산사%황토구%파경지%천구%형태특정
cultivation%runoff%sediments%Loessial region%sloping farmland%ephemeral gully%morphological characteristic
为研究耕作对浅沟径流产沙及形态发育特征的影响,在野外调查的基础上,设计坡度(15°、20°、25°)、雨强(1.0、1.5、2.0 mm/min)及放水流量(7.53~23.45 L/min)3个处理,采用室内模拟降雨和放水冲刷的方法,测定了不同处理下浅沟径流量、产沙量。结果表明:1)2种浅沟水流均为紊流,耕作使浅沟水流雷诺数和弗劳德数分别减小0.95%~30.77%、2.64%~39.14%,阻力系数和糙率系数分别增加4.01%~58.82%、0.88%~27.87%;2)试验条件下,耕作使浅沟土壤剥蚀率增大9.48%~37.87%,未耕作与耕作浅沟土壤剥蚀率分别与坡度—流量交互作用、雨强—坡度交互作用呈极显著线性关系,土壤剥蚀率与径流剪切力、径流功率及单位径流功率均呈显著的线性关系,未耕作浅沟发生剥蚀的临界剪切力、临界功率及临界单位径流功率分别为17.576 N/m2、5.036 W/(m2·s)、0.0381 m/s,耕作浅沟为10.585 N/m2、3.544 W/(m2·s)、0.0277 m/s;3)耕作使浅沟宽度增加1.98%~31.79%,浅沟面积增大0.84%~32.03%,下切深度降低2.82%~26.67%;4)耕作使浅沟土壤侵蚀量增加0.91%~22.80%,未耕作和耕作浅沟土壤侵蚀量分别占坡面土壤侵蚀总量的44.09%~74.16%和42.44%~56.44%,与雨强—流量交互作用均呈极显著的线性函数关系。结果可为该区浅沟侵蚀预测模型的建立及农业生态环境安全与保护提供科学依据。
為研究耕作對淺溝徑流產沙及形態髮育特徵的影響,在野外調查的基礎上,設計坡度(15°、20°、25°)、雨彊(1.0、1.5、2.0 mm/min)及放水流量(7.53~23.45 L/min)3箇處理,採用室內模擬降雨和放水遲刷的方法,測定瞭不同處理下淺溝徑流量、產沙量。結果錶明:1)2種淺溝水流均為紊流,耕作使淺溝水流雷諾數和弗勞德數分彆減小0.95%~30.77%、2.64%~39.14%,阻力繫數和糙率繫數分彆增加4.01%~58.82%、0.88%~27.87%;2)試驗條件下,耕作使淺溝土壤剝蝕率增大9.48%~37.87%,未耕作與耕作淺溝土壤剝蝕率分彆與坡度—流量交互作用、雨彊—坡度交互作用呈極顯著線性關繫,土壤剝蝕率與徑流剪切力、徑流功率及單位徑流功率均呈顯著的線性關繫,未耕作淺溝髮生剝蝕的臨界剪切力、臨界功率及臨界單位徑流功率分彆為17.576 N/m2、5.036 W/(m2·s)、0.0381 m/s,耕作淺溝為10.585 N/m2、3.544 W/(m2·s)、0.0277 m/s;3)耕作使淺溝寬度增加1.98%~31.79%,淺溝麵積增大0.84%~32.03%,下切深度降低2.82%~26.67%;4)耕作使淺溝土壤侵蝕量增加0.91%~22.80%,未耕作和耕作淺溝土壤侵蝕量分彆佔坡麵土壤侵蝕總量的44.09%~74.16%和42.44%~56.44%,與雨彊—流量交互作用均呈極顯著的線性函數關繫。結果可為該區淺溝侵蝕預測模型的建立及農業生態環境安全與保護提供科學依據。
위연구경작대천구경유산사급형태발육특정적영향,재야외조사적기출상,설계파도(15°、20°、25°)、우강(1.0、1.5、2.0 mm/min)급방수류량(7.53~23.45 L/min)3개처리,채용실내모의강우화방수충쇄적방법,측정료불동처리하천구경류량、산사량。결과표명:1)2충천구수류균위문류,경작사천구수류뢰낙수화불로덕수분별감소0.95%~30.77%、2.64%~39.14%,조력계수화조솔계수분별증가4.01%~58.82%、0.88%~27.87%;2)시험조건하,경작사천구토양박식솔증대9.48%~37.87%,미경작여경작천구토양박식솔분별여파도—류량교호작용、우강—파도교호작용정겁현저선성관계,토양박식솔여경류전절력、경류공솔급단위경류공솔균정현저적선성관계,미경작천구발생박식적림계전절력、림계공솔급림계단위경류공솔분별위17.576 N/m2、5.036 W/(m2·s)、0.0381 m/s,경작천구위10.585 N/m2、3.544 W/(m2·s)、0.0277 m/s;3)경작사천구관도증가1.98%~31.79%,천구면적증대0.84%~32.03%,하절심도강저2.82%~26.67%;4)경작사천구토양침식량증가0.91%~22.80%,미경작화경작천구토양침식량분별점파면토양침식총량적44.09%~74.16%화42.44%~56.44%,여우강—류량교호작용균정겁현저적선성함수관계。결과가위해구천구침식예측모형적건립급농업생태배경안전여보호제공과학의거。
In the hill-gully area of the Loess Plateau, serious man-made soil and water loss occurs in disturbed soils of sloping farmlands formed in the process of tillage operation. Frequent farming activities cause ephemeral gullies to develop continuously on sloping farmlands. Although an ephemeral gully may be refilled and rehabilitated, new ephemeral gully may develop in the original position in next rainy season. An indoor flow scouring experiment under artificially simulated rainfall was carried out in the State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, China in July 2014. The effects of tillage treatments on runoff and sediment yielding in ephemeral gully and its morphology were investigated at different rainfall intensities and slope degrees under the condition of upslope concentrated flow. Based on preliminary field investigations, 3 slope degrees of 15°, 20° and 25° were selected. Rainfall intensity was designed at 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm/min. Flow discharges were 7.53 to 23.45 L/min. Plots of 8 m×1m were laid out for experiments and 3 flow sections were set up for runoff and sediment measurements. Before each test, rainfall intensity was calibrated repeatedly until the rainfall uniformity coefficient reached 85% or above. During each test, flow velocity was measured with dye tracing method and flow width and depth were measured with point gauge system. Runoff sample was taken once a minute within 3 minutes before runoff generation, and once 3 minutes after runoff generation. The results showed that: 1) Flow regimes for non-tilled and tilled ephemeral gullies were characterized by turbulent flow; Tillage could decrease Reynolds number and Froude number by 0.95%-30.77% and 3.41%-35.66%, and increase Darcy-Weisbachcoefficient and Manning roughness coefficient by 4.01%-58.82% and 0.88%-27.87%, respectively; and 2) Compared to non-tilled ephemeral gully, the soil detachment rate for tilled ephemeral gully increased by 9.48%-37.87% under the experimental condition; The soil detachment rates for non-tillage and tillage ephemeral gullies were in a very significantly linear relationship with the interaction of slope and flow discharge, and the interaction of rainfall intensity and slope; It was also significantly linearly correlated with flow shear stress, stream power and unit stream power; Critical shear stress, stream power and unit stream power was 17.576 N/m2, 5.036 W/(m2·s) and 0.0381 m/s, respectively for non-tillage ephemeral gully, and 10.585 N/m2, 3.544 W/(m2·s) and 0.0277 m/s, respectively for tillage ephemeral gully; 3) Compared to non-tillage ephemeral gully, the eroded width and area of tilled ephemeral gully increased by 1.98%-31.79% and 0.84%-32.03%, respectively, but the incised depth was reduced by 2.82%-26.67%; 4) The soil erosion mass for ephemeral gully increased from 0.91% to 22.80% due to tillage treatment; The ratios of soil erosion mass for tillage and non-tillage ephemeral gullies to the total soil erosion mass were 35.95%-57.72% and 42.68%-69.03%, respectively. The erosion masses for non-tillage and tillage ephemeral gullies were a significantly linear function of the interaction of rainfall intensity and flow discharge. This study may provide valuble information for the construction of an ephemeral gully erosion model and the security and protection of agricultural eco-environment.