农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
15期
19-25
,共7页
魏正英%马胜利%周兴%苑伟静
魏正英%馬勝利%週興%苑偉靜
위정영%마성리%주흥%원위정
灌溉%结构%膜片%滴灌%压力补偿灌水器%水力性能%影响因素
灌溉%結構%膜片%滴灌%壓力補償灌水器%水力性能%影響因素
관개%결구%막편%적관%압력보상관수기%수력성능%영향인소
irrigation%structure%diaphragms%drip irrigation%pressure-compensating emitter%hydraulic performance%influential factors
压力补偿灌水器以其补偿性能好、灌水均匀、铺设长度长等优点得到广泛应用。但由于影响压力补偿灌水器水力性能的因素比较复杂,因此造成压力补偿灌水器设计和优化的困难。该文通过理论分析确定影响压力补偿灌水器水力性能的关键因素包括压力调节腔出水口位置、出水口直径、压力调节腔凸台高度、直径、小槽宽度、弹性膜片的材料性能与厚度,并进一步通过水力性能试验研究了这些关键因素对灌水器水力性能的影响。结果表明:压力调节腔出水口距离越远,流量调节性能越差;压力调节腔出口直径增大会导致工作区间减小;凸台高度应该<0.3 mm,否则无补偿效果;凸台直径的改变对灌水器性能影响不大;槽宽的增大有利于提高压力补偿过程的平稳性,但减弱流量调节性能;膜片硬度对补偿效果影响很大,硬度为50 HA时补偿效果最优;膜片厚度的增加可减缓高压阶段流量随压力增长而下降的趋势,有利于灌水器在高压工况下保持流量稳定。研究为压力补偿灌水器的设计和优化提供了参考。
壓力補償灌水器以其補償性能好、灌水均勻、鋪設長度長等優點得到廣汎應用。但由于影響壓力補償灌水器水力性能的因素比較複雜,因此造成壓力補償灌水器設計和優化的睏難。該文通過理論分析確定影響壓力補償灌水器水力性能的關鍵因素包括壓力調節腔齣水口位置、齣水口直徑、壓力調節腔凸檯高度、直徑、小槽寬度、彈性膜片的材料性能與厚度,併進一步通過水力性能試驗研究瞭這些關鍵因素對灌水器水力性能的影響。結果錶明:壓力調節腔齣水口距離越遠,流量調節性能越差;壓力調節腔齣口直徑增大會導緻工作區間減小;凸檯高度應該<0.3 mm,否則無補償效果;凸檯直徑的改變對灌水器性能影響不大;槽寬的增大有利于提高壓力補償過程的平穩性,但減弱流量調節性能;膜片硬度對補償效果影響很大,硬度為50 HA時補償效果最優;膜片厚度的增加可減緩高壓階段流量隨壓力增長而下降的趨勢,有利于灌水器在高壓工況下保持流量穩定。研究為壓力補償灌水器的設計和優化提供瞭參攷。
압력보상관수기이기보상성능호、관수균균、포설장도장등우점득도엄범응용。단유우영향압력보상관수기수력성능적인소비교복잡,인차조성압력보상관수기설계화우화적곤난。해문통과이론분석학정영향압력보상관수기수력성능적관건인소포괄압력조절강출수구위치、출수구직경、압력조절강철태고도、직경、소조관도、탄성막편적재료성능여후도,병진일보통과수력성능시험연구료저사관건인소대관수기수력성능적영향。결과표명:압력조절강출수구거리월원,류량조절성능월차;압력조절강출구직경증대회도치공작구간감소;철태고도응해<0.3 mm,부칙무보상효과;철태직경적개변대관수기성능영향불대;조관적증대유리우제고압력보상과정적평은성,단감약류량조절성능;막편경도대보상효과영향흔대,경도위50 HA시보상효과최우;막편후도적증가가감완고압계단류량수압력증장이하강적추세,유리우관수기재고압공황하보지류량은정。연구위압력보상관수기적설계화우화제공료삼고。
Pressure-compensating emitter is widely used in the agricultural irrigation due to its better compensation and higher uniformity performance than non-pressure compensating one. However, the factors that influence the hydraulic properties of pressure-compensating emitter are complicated, which causes difficulty in design and optimization of the structure of the pressure-compensating emitter. In this study, we determined important influential factors of pressure-compensating emitter based on theoretical analysis and investigated effects of those important factors on its hydraulic performance in laboratory tests. Single factor and orthogonal experiment designs were carried out to analyze the each factor’s and their interactive effect. The HydroPC cylindrical pressure-compensating emitter with orifice inline was purchased from PLASTRO. It had working pressure of 60-350 kPa, flow rate of 1.2 L/h, outlet distance of 2.8 mm, cavity diameter of 6.8 mm, boss height of 0.1 mm, groove width of 0.35 mm, boss diameter of 2 mm, diaphragm hardness of 30 HA, and diaphragm thickness of 0.85 mm. The theoretical analysis showed that the hydraulic performance of the emitter could be affected by the distance of outlet from inlet, the outlet diameter of the pressure regulating cavity, the height of the boss in the regulating cavity, the diameter of the boss in the regulating cavity, the width of the boss in pressure regulating cavity, the materials characteristics of the diaphragm such as hardness and thickness. The hydraulic performance experiment of single-factor design showed that: 1) The far distance of inlet from outlet could result in poor flow regulating performance of the emitter since the flow rate tended to be reduced with high working pressure; 2) When the pressure regulating cavity diameter was 00.5 mm, the emitter had good compensating performance and also high initial pressure, which suggested the diameter should be less than 0.05 mm under non-micro drip irrigation; 3) Boss height had a large influence on pressure-compensating performance and its optimal value was 0.2 mm; 4) Boss height did not greatly affect hydraulic performance of the emitter and the performance was almost same when its value was high than 2.0 mm; and 4) The large value of groove width could facilitate pressure-compensating process but not the flow regulating performance. The orthogonal experiment revealed that the hydraulic performance of the emitter was optimal with flow exponent of 0.02795 and initial pressure of 25 kPa when its boss diameter was 2.0 mm, groove width was 0.35 mm, outlet distance and diameter were 2.0 and 0.8 mm, boss height was 0.1 mm. In addition, the material properties of the diaphragm could greatly affect pressure-compensating performance and the performance was best when the hardness of diaphragm was 50° and the thickness was 0.7 mm. In sum, those factors should be considered in design of pressure-compensating emitters. The results would provide important data for emitter design.