现代肿瘤医学
現代腫瘤醫學
현대종류의학
JOURNAL OF MODERN ONCOLOGY
2015年
17期
2503-2505
,共3页
张先稳%张西志%花威%汪步海%陈婷婷%李军
張先穩%張西誌%花威%汪步海%陳婷婷%李軍
장선은%장서지%화위%왕보해%진정정%리군
前列腺癌%RapidArc%调强放射治疗%剂量体积直方图
前列腺癌%RapidArc%調彊放射治療%劑量體積直方圖
전렬선암%RapidArc%조강방사치료%제량체적직방도
prostate cancer%RapidArc%intensity modulated radiation therapy%dose-volume histograms
目的:探讨RapidArc在前列腺癌放疗中的适用性。方法:对6例前列腺癌患者设计双弧RapidArc计划,处方剂量为7600cGy。用 COMPASS系统验证剂量。利用剂量体积直方图分析临床靶区、危及器官OARs的各评价指标。结果:CTV的HI、CI分别为1.08±0.03、0.87±0.06,有较好的均匀性和适合度。PTV的HI、CI稍差。膀胱和直肠的V40仅为(18.98±4.82)%和(20.50±3.03)%,平均剂量也较低,在3000cGy左右。股骨头D5%也在4000cGy以内。COMPASS剂量验证所得CTV和PTV各指标差异在4%以内,危及器官评价指标差异在5%以内。等中心处绝对剂量准确率达(99.08±0.66)%,靶区和各危及器官的γ通过率达96%、98%以上。结论:RapidArc能够满足前列腺癌放疗的临床剂量学要求。
目的:探討RapidArc在前列腺癌放療中的適用性。方法:對6例前列腺癌患者設計雙弧RapidArc計劃,處方劑量為7600cGy。用 COMPASS繫統驗證劑量。利用劑量體積直方圖分析臨床靶區、危及器官OARs的各評價指標。結果:CTV的HI、CI分彆為1.08±0.03、0.87±0.06,有較好的均勻性和適閤度。PTV的HI、CI稍差。膀胱和直腸的V40僅為(18.98±4.82)%和(20.50±3.03)%,平均劑量也較低,在3000cGy左右。股骨頭D5%也在4000cGy以內。COMPASS劑量驗證所得CTV和PTV各指標差異在4%以內,危及器官評價指標差異在5%以內。等中心處絕對劑量準確率達(99.08±0.66)%,靶區和各危及器官的γ通過率達96%、98%以上。結論:RapidArc能夠滿足前列腺癌放療的臨床劑量學要求。
목적:탐토RapidArc재전렬선암방료중적괄용성。방법:대6례전렬선암환자설계쌍호RapidArc계화,처방제량위7600cGy。용 COMPASS계통험증제량。이용제량체적직방도분석림상파구、위급기관OARs적각평개지표。결과:CTV적HI、CI분별위1.08±0.03、0.87±0.06,유교호적균균성화괄합도。PTV적HI、CI초차。방광화직장적V40부위(18.98±4.82)%화(20.50±3.03)%,평균제량야교저,재3000cGy좌우。고골두D5%야재4000cGy이내。COMPASS제량험증소득CTV화PTV각지표차이재4%이내,위급기관평개지표차이재5%이내。등중심처절대제량준학솔체(99.08±0.66)%,파구화각위급기관적γ통과솔체96%、98%이상。결론:RapidArc능구만족전렬선암방료적림상제량학요구。
Objective:To study the application suitability of RapidArc for prostate cancer. Methods:We design two arcs RapidArc plan for 6 patients. Prescription dose was 7600cGy. The COMPASS dose verification system was used to verify these plans. Target and organs at risk( OAR)were evaluated with dose-volume histograms( DVH). Results:CTV had good HI,CI,separately was 1. 08 ± 0. 03,0. 87 ± 0. 06. PTV HI,CI slightly worse. The V40 of blad-der and rectum were(18. 98 ± 4. 82)%,(20. 50 ± 3. 03)%. The Dmean was low,at about 3000cGy. The femoral head D5% within 4000cGy. The COMPASS dose verification of CTV and PTV index difference was less than 4%. In addi-tion,organs at risk evaluation index difference was less than 5%. Center absolute dose accuracy was(99. 08 ± 0. 66)%. The gamma pass rates of target and OARs were more than 96%,98%. Conclusion:RapidArc could satisfy the clinical requirements of dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer.